Cyberyeti, on 2015-September-26, 07:47, said:
My concern with many of these auctions is that a lot of them go the same way for long enough opposite AQxxx, KQJxx, Jxx, void (or Jx, x) that you reach a potentially unmakeable 4♠ when you wanted to be in 3N/4♥.
Assume blah blah blah 3S. There is a good argument for 4D being choice between majors, I agree. Especially when 2/1 and Responder had bid 3C. However, I think 4H is that call, choice. But, this then begs the question of what 4C and 4D mean.
I think the following would be a logical approach:
4H choice. 55 majors, diamond hole.
4S to play
4C 5512/5503, unclear srength
4D as 65, general slam noise.
Now, if 4D is general slam noise, Responder probably should be able to bid 4H as some other noise.
If everyone is just making indecipherable noise, that's fine, but I think there is a good meaning to assume. Diamond control is the likelihood. IMO, 4D by Opener should be true noise, with 4H by Responder an inference fusion of Last Train and Lackwood, perhaps "Lack Train," if you will. Acceptance, but no diamond control.
I really like this. Cool sequence.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.