BBO Discussion Forums: Affordable and Quality Health Care - BBO Discussion Forums

On a different set of recent posts, in my experience emergency room care is a very very mixed bag. Very.

I found comments from renown British cardiac surgeon Stephen Westaby informative in this whole discussion regarding socialized medicine, minimum health care coverage and Medicaid budgets.

Britain's National Health Care service values saving money over saving lives.
NHS is reluctant to cover the costs of advanced interventions.
He discusses treatment delays and poor attention to best practices by the NHS
Medical Directors are intent on ensuring that "no one does anything new or interesting" (lets call that innovation or lack thereof)

 kenberg, on 2017-July-14, 05:54, said:

It is interesting that your experience and my experience is at odds with the poster who is selling ER as the best answer for healthcare.

 rmnka447, on 2017-July-13, 14:02, said:

The ACA is clearly not a panacea, it's full of compromises that were necessary to get it passed. But it was a step in the right direction, with plans to implement other improvements like cost containment. The GOP is trying to go backwards, without replacing it with a better solution.

 barmar, on 2017-July-14, 07:52, said:

The GOP is trying to rollback ACA so it can give tax breaks to the wealthy constituents before the 2018 midterm elections. There is a method to the madness.

 RedSpawn, on 2017-July-16, 15:28, said:

Negative income tax or Universal Income anyone?


as for health care some version or form of medicare or Medicaid for everyone seems the pathway, We can deal with paying for it, fixing it, stopping fraud and waste and some form of tort reform for later.

As long as there are tests to perform to stop a lawsuit, patients refuse to ask the cost, we only ask if it hurts, docs will order it.

Recent study/report on how US Health Care compares to other developed countries: http://www.commonwea.../mirror-mirror/

 ldrews, on 2017-July-17, 19:15, said:

This is good. Thanks for the post.

So it appears that the Republican Senate couldn't get its act together, even to just repeal Obamacare. Just another indication of the lack of social consensus.

Obamacare will continue to be the law of the land for the foreseeable future. And it appears to be imploding. All of those people who now have individual/family coverage and can't afford the premiums, copays or deductibles. And all of those people who are eligible but cannot even get coverage because there are no insurers left in their area. Let us hope that not too many people get hurt.

 ldrews, on 2017-July-18, 15:00, said:

To the contrary, it is a sign of a majority social consensus that the government should help its citizens to get healthcare.

Quote

How, exactly, would they have been better off if one of the GOP repeal/replace/rexxxx bills had passed?

 ldrews, on 2017-July-18, 15:00, said:

Weird. You have shown you are capable of providing reasonable information - but when you talk about the ACA all you do is repeat Trump's BS talking points. The ACA is not collapsing; however, there are areas of it that need improvements. Rising deductibles is only one part.

The reality is that prior to the ACA many states only had 1 or 2 insurers. With the ACA, many states added insurers but now those added insurers are backing out of the states they entered for a variety of reasons. Here in Oklahoma, a Kansas insurer offered coverage the first year of the ACA then withdrew the next year.

That the number of insurers in states is reverting to the norm doesn't mean that the ACA is losing insurers.

Here's a fact check:
http://www.politifac...out-soaring-ob/

Wasn't there some woman back maybe 25 years ago who tried to get a healthcare plan going? Hillary something or other I think she was called. Maybe Donny and Hillary could go out for a drink and console each other.

 Winstonm, on 2017-July-18, 15:28, said:

Remember when ldrews used to tell everyone to ignore everything DT says? He appears to have become a victim of his own argument.

 rmnka447, on 2017-July-09, 14:13, said:

You are right that expanding access to healthcare will, in itself, increase the demand for healthcare. And the demand for healthcare in the US is already high and will, regardless of political (non)solutions, grow even bigger for demographic and technological reasons.

However, there are some reasons to hope that expanding access to healthcare will not increase the demand as much as a quick back-of-the envelope calculation suggests:
- Some health services are provided to uninsured anyway, for example through ER. This is not necessarily the most efficient way of providing healthcare so in some cases, the pressure on resources could actually drop.
- Providing care for patients before the disease progress to a stage that require more drastic interventions (removing an appendix before the patient needs to be sent to the ICU etc) could in some cases save resources.

That said, I think that at some point Americans need to get used to the idea that they have to do something about health care that is provided for purely commercial reasons. Somehow doctors need to be motivated to avoid procedures that are not cost-efficient, regardless of who will be paying for it.

 helene_t, on 2017-July-18, 16:26, said:

I believe that California has pending legislation to provide universal healthcare to the residents of California. The only problem seems to be that the estimated budget to fund it is 3 times the current total state budget.

Is everyone prepared to pay the bill for universal health care?

 cherdano, on 2017-July-18, 15:25, said:

Well, the Democrats and Republicans certainly do not have a consensus, and the Republicans, among themselves do not have a consensus, as is evidenced by the recent elections and legislative failure. Exactly how do you infer a majority social consensus from this?

I have no idea how the public would be better off under the Republican plans. I think the Republicans are just as screwed up as the Democrats on this issue. But I continue to read about insurance companies pulling out of the market leaving many areas with no insurers available for the private plans, or only 1 insurer available (can you say "no competition" to hold prices?), I also read about premiums going up rapidly, 76% in Oklahoma just this last year. And deductibles also going up. A study showed that 50% of Obamacare hospital copay bills for 2016 are still unpaid, higher % for larger bills.

My take on this is that even if one qualifies for Obamacare, one cannot afford it. This does not seem to me to be signs of a functioning system.

 Zelandakh, on 2017-July-18, 15:50, said:

And I still say to watch what Trump does, not what he says. Of course the media doesn't seem to spend much time on reporting what he does, only what he says and RussiaGate.

 ldrews, on 2017-July-18, 17:44, said:

What you fail to mention is that if California adopts a single payer then none of the individuals or corporations would have to pay insurance premiums - that amount could be collected as taxes and eliminate the high administrative costs inherent in the current private payer system.

 ldrews, on 2017-July-18, 18:03, said:

What he does? Like this?

Quote

 Winstonm, on 2017-July-18, 18:12, said:

Exactly. Trump seems to be establishing better relations with Russia. As the major nuclear weapon power in the world today, I think that is probably a good idea. Or would you prefer to have a confrontational relationship with Russia?