BBO Discussion Forums: pet peeve thread - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 57 Pages +
  • « First
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

pet peeve thread

#761 User is offline   Trinidad 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,531
  • Joined: 2005-October-09
  • Location:Netherlands

Posted 2014-June-30, 08:40

View Postbillw55, on 2014-June-30, 08:09, said:

I am curious, what proposed alternatives are you referring to?

Proposed alternatives that I know of:
  • Continue playing for the "golden goal".
  • Take one player away from each team and play for a golden goal. (If no score after n minutes take away another player.)
  • Ice hockey (or field hockey) like shootouts: player gets the ball relatively far away from the goal and is supposed to score while continuously moving forward.
  • Play a rematch.

My feelings are similar to gwnn's.

Rik
I want my opponents to leave my table with a smile on their face and without matchpoints on their score card - in that order.
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
0

#762 User is online   kenberg 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,056
  • Joined: 2004-September-22
  • Location:Northern Maryland

Posted 2014-June-30, 08:59

View Postgwnn, on 2014-June-28, 23:43, said:

'They have good players but not a team' said like it is some great deep wisdom, never heard before.




Usually said by those who have to fill air time.My favorite, from American football, is "They have to move the ball down the field and put some points on the scoreboard". This idea has presumably not occurred to the quarterback or the audience.
Ken
0

#763 User is online   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,087
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:UK

Posted 2014-June-30, 09:03

View Postkenberg, on 2014-June-30, 08:59, said:

My favorite, from American football, is "They have to move the ball down the field and put some points on the scoreboard". This idea has presumably not occurred to the quarterback or the audience.

From association football: "Now it starts raining. The spectators are getting wet".

I always turn the sound off when watching footie, but of course I can't do that when other people want to watch it as well. Apparently the idiotic commentary is an essential part of the experience.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#764 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Göttingen, Germany
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2014-June-30, 09:07

View Postbillw55, on 2014-June-30, 08:09, said:

I am curious, what proposed alternatives are you referring to?

The most famous one is eliminating one player from each side every 5 minutes and see who scores first. They also tried one-on-one runs like in ice hockey but I don't see how nerves are not a part of that, too. "The side who had the most corners" is something I heard more than once too but I guess they were just trying to come up with something ridiculous on purpose.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#765 User is online   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,087
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:UK

Posted 2014-June-30, 09:10

Remove the goalkeepers and then play 2x10 minutes more?
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#766 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Göttingen, Germany
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2014-June-30, 09:13

View Posthelene_t, on 2014-June-30, 09:10, said:

Remove the goalkeepers and then play 2x10 minutes more?

Why not remove the outfield players instead while we're having fun?
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#767 User is offline   Aberlour10 

  • Vugrapholic
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,018
  • Joined: 2004-January-06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:At the Rhine River km 772,1

Posted 2014-June-30, 09:44

View Postgwnn, on 2014-June-28, 23:43, said:

Penalty shootouts are fun and there is very real skill involved on both sides, not just nerves. .


how about penalties like in ice-hockey. player runs from the middle point, keeper must stay in the penalty box.

player and ball has to move only forwards, every foul on him = goal. would be funny to watch.



Preempts are Aberlour's best bridge friends
0

#768 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2014-June-30, 09:57

View Postgwnn, on 2014-June-30, 09:07, said:

The most famous one is eliminating one player from each side every 5 minutes and see who scores first. They also tried one-on-one runs like in ice hockey but I don't see how nerves are not a part of that, too. "The side who had the most corners" is something I heard more than once too but I guess they were just trying to come up with something ridiculous on purpose.

In local high school soccer, there are no shootouts. Indeed, if the game is tied at the end of two 15 minute overtime periods, the team with the most corner kicks is the winner.
0

#769 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Göttingen, Germany
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2014-June-30, 10:07

View PostAberlour10, on 2014-June-30, 09:44, said:

how about penalties like in ice-hockey. player runs from the middle point, keeper must stay in the penalty box.

player and ball has to move only forwards, every foul on him = goal. would be funny to watch.

I'm not a big fan but the few of them I saw were fun to watch, but not really more fun or as spectacular as the good old penalty shootout. I saw them once in the TIM triangle friendly tournament and one other time. Like I said above, though, would it really eliminate the perceived luck factor or nerves? I don't see how. Similarly, how does it address the criticism that it does not reflect "real skill"? Actually penalties come up more frequently than real one-on-ones (where the defenders are hopelessly far away). I remember Raul in 2000 (vs Valencia) or Fernando Torres vs Barcelona in 2012 but it doesn't really come up in real football. Neither does 9 against 9. Just step up and put the ball in the top corner, don't complain about the lottery.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#770 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2014-June-30, 16:55

View Posthelene_t, on 2014-June-30, 09:03, said:

From association football: "Now it starts raining. The spectators are getting wet".

I always turn the sound off when watching footie, but of course I can't do that when other people want to watch it as well. Apparently the idiotic commentary is an essential part of the experience.


This one happens so often in spannish ones: It would be good to score now (or before the half ends)
0

#771 User is offline   billw55 

  • enigmatic
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,757
  • Joined: 2009-July-31
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2014-July-01, 08:40

Ah, some of those ideas I had heard before, and some not. Among them, a hockey-style shootout doesn't really seem all that different from the current shootout; and reducing number of players does not seem terrible. Removing keepers is something I have heard proposed for local youth soccer, along with (I'm not making this up) putting two balls in play.

Most corners seems pretty weird. Refs would have to track this now?
Life is long and beautiful, if bad things happen, good things will follow.
-gwnn
0

#772 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,516
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2014-July-01, 09:31

How about a penalty shootout with penalties taken from the edge of the 18-yard box?
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#773 User is offline   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,925
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2014-July-01, 10:31

View Postcherdano, on 2014-July-01, 09:31, said:

How about a penalty shootout with penalties taken from the edge of the 18-yard box?


I've thought this, or 2 from the penalty spot, 2 from the edge of the box (possibly one slightly left of centre, one slightly right), 2 from the middle of the D.
0

#774 User is offline   barmar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 21,415
  • Joined: 2004-August-21
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2014-July-02, 10:43

Pet peeve: thread drift.

Could we take this ongoing discussion of penalty kicks to the World Cup thread, or start a new thread specific to it?

#775 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 16,739
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2014-July-02, 14:08

Pet peeve

That so many of us in the USA who watch or play little to no soccer are fully ready and prepared to tell the rest of the world how to change and improve their game. :)
1

#776 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,516
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2014-July-03, 03:22

View Postbarmar, on 2014-July-02, 10:43, said:

Pet peeve: thread drift.

Could we take this ongoing discussion of penalty kicks to the World Cup thread, or start a new thread specific to it?


I'd rather have "soccer" fans derail a pet peeve thread by talking about the world cup, instead of seeing US posters derail a thread about the world cup by discussing rule changes. Would you consider it on topic if a thread about the Bermuda Bowl gets taken over by suggestions that in order to simplify the game for spectators, we should only allow 3 rounds of bidding?
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
1

#777 User is offline   Vampyr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,611
  • Joined: 2009-September-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:London

Posted 2014-July-03, 10:18

View Postbarmar, on 2014-July-02, 10:43, said:

Pet peeve: thread drift.


People who complain about thread drift.

No, I'm not citing you, here, barmar.

In many bridge threads, after the question or issue in the OP has been thoroughly played out, discussion may move on to a related or tangential matter. Sometimes posters will then complain that the thread has drifted and end there, without even offering a new insight or neglected aspect of the OP topic.
I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones -- Albert Einstein
0

#778 User is offline   Antrax 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,458
  • Joined: 2011-March-15
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2014-July-03, 21:23

Gimmick posters, especially on Facebook. One recent fad here was a character basically named "boring Joe" that posted a lot of "everyday" crap about some fictitious office job and friends. Because it's ironic people followed that crap, no problem. But then, that account started invading other discussions to make boring comments about them, and then normal posters start making boring comments and hash-tagging them "boringJoe" and then you're assaulted with intentional stupidity, but it's ironic so it's supposed to be funny or something.
This happens way too often. Give unfunny people an outlet to feel clever and they'll abuse the hell out of it.
0

#779 User is offline   Thiros 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 130
  • Joined: 2012-September-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:California Commonwealth
  • Interests:Greek fire, Damascus steel, Linear A

Posted 2014-July-04, 00:27

Jack-FM cutting good songs off early.
0

#780 User is offline   barmar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 21,415
  • Joined: 2004-August-21
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2014-July-05, 00:13

View PostAntrax, on 2014-July-03, 21:23, said:

This happens way too often. Give unfunny people an outlet to feel clever and they'll abuse the hell out of it.


Isn't that practically Twitter's entire business model?

  • 57 Pages +
  • « First
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

3 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users