BBO Discussion Forums: From the top or finesse? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

From the top or finesse?

#1 User is offline   Walddk 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,190
  • Joined: 2003-September-30
  • Location:London, England
  • Interests:Cricket

Posted 2005-October-21, 02:44

Meant for beginners/intermediates only. Advanced or better: please use hidden text.

53

AKQJ8

Plenty of entries to dummy. You need all 5 tricks and you start by cashing a top honour. LHO follows with the 10. What now, go for the drop or enter dummy in order to finesse the 8 if you believe that the 10 was a singleton?

Another question. Does it matter which honour you cash first? I know they are all equals to you, but should you try a specific honour rather than another?

Roland
It's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice
0

#2 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2005-October-21, 07:14

Spoiler

Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#3 User is offline   Echognome 

  • Deipnosophist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,386
  • Joined: 2005-March-22

Posted 2005-October-21, 08:01

Spoiler

"Half the people you know are below average." - Steven Wright
0

#4 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2005-October-21, 08:06

Spoiler

0

#5 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,520
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2005-October-21, 08:12

Echognome, on Oct 21 2005, 04:01 PM, said:

Spoiler

Spoiler

The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#6 User is offline   kgr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,448
  • Joined: 2003-April-11

Posted 2005-October-21, 08:16

And what if your hand is

53

AKQ92

and LHO drops the J on the first trick? LHO is expert/advanced/beginner?
0

#7 User is offline   Walddk 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,190
  • Joined: 2003-September-30
  • Location:London, England
  • Interests:Cricket

Posted 2005-October-21, 08:23

kgr, on Oct 21 2005, 04:16 PM, said:

And what if your hand is

53

AKQ92

and LHO drops the J on the first trick? LHO is expert/advanced/beginner?

If you mean 5 tricks I simply must go for the drop. Singleton jack doesn't give me 5 tricks no matter what I do.

Roland
It's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice
0

#8 User is offline   sceptic 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,343
  • Joined: 2004-January-03

Posted 2005-October-21, 08:33

low to A

I doubt I could guess if the 10 is a false card or not, I assume some clues from bidding would be available

but a 5/1 split is lower percentage and if it is split 6/0 with entries to dummy you make 5 anyway as left hand O would have all 6 if he played the 10 any other split and you make 5 tricks anyway

the only split that can hurt you is 5/1 with right hand O having 5

so if left hand O shows up with 5 to the Jack y0ou would have to end play him for the 5th trick
0

#9 User is offline   kgr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,448
  • Joined: 2003-April-11

Posted 2005-October-21, 08:40

Walddk, on Oct 21 2005, 04:23 PM, said:

kgr, on Oct 21 2005, 04:16 PM, said:

And what if your hand is

53

AKQ92

and LHO drops the J on the first trick? LHO is expert/advanced/beginner?

If you mean 5 tricks I simply must go for the drop. Singleton jack doesn't give me 5 tricks no matter what I do.

Roland

Hmm...right.
This proves that knowing percentages is not the most important...you also need to think.
...Can I know apply again for the BIL?


Your hand is:
532

AKQ9

And LHO drops x and J under AK. Do you play Q next or finesse?
Does it make a difference if LHO knows that you have a 5-card or not?
I'm not sure about the answer. I think 4-2 or 3-3 probabilities do not differ a lot. I would play Q against top players and finesse against others.
Thinking while I write: ...or is this restricted choice? No, probably not. With Jxx LHO can still falsecard with the J. But Hey!, If he does that then our finesse will work. So, the falsecard will only be effective with JTx. And then LHO plays the J from the remaining JT. So it is restricted choice anyway and also against experts I will finesse the 3th trick.
=> This was interesting for me :) (hope I finally came to the correct conclusion).

EDITED: gave declarer AKQ9 iso AKQ98
0

#10 User is offline   MickyB 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,290
  • Joined: 2004-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, England

Posted 2005-October-21, 08:44

If you remove declarer's 8-spot, then yes, you did :D
0

#11 User is offline   Echognome 

  • Deipnosophist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,386
  • Joined: 2005-March-22

Posted 2005-October-21, 08:49

cherdano, on Oct 21 2005, 03:12 PM, said:

Spoiler

Spoiler

"Half the people you know are below average." - Steven Wright
0

#12 User is offline   kgr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,448
  • Joined: 2003-April-11

Posted 2005-October-21, 08:54

MickyB, on Oct 21 2005, 04:44 PM, said:

If you remove declarer's 8-spot, then yes, you did  :D

right :D I changed it.
0

#13 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2005-October-21, 08:57

with AKQ9 opp xxx when you play the AK and it goes low then jack on your left, a falsecard from an original holding of Jxx is not relevant. When you lead up towards the Q9, the ten (now stiff) will pop up on your right. So it is indeed restricted choice.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users