Page 1 of 1
How do you split your honors
#1
Posted 2005-November-03, 05:31
Assume standard leads and signaling.
Kanter's way is
Q from QJ10
J from J109 or KQJ
With only 2 honors usually dont split but if you do split:
K from AK
Q from KQ
Q from QJ
Looks kind of strange since no rule of either split high or split low.
The Q is most ambigious but the idea is that wht only 2 honors KQ or QJ you usually dont split (also i guess if the ace is seen you can split KQ with the K and avoid this problem).
Still i think there must be a better set of rules to spliting.
Kanter's way is
Q from QJ10
J from J109 or KQJ
With only 2 honors usually dont split but if you do split:
K from AK
Q from KQ
Q from QJ
Looks kind of strange since no rule of either split high or split low.
The Q is most ambigious but the idea is that wht only 2 honors KQ or QJ you usually dont split (also i guess if the ace is seen you can split KQ with the K and avoid this problem).
Still i think there must be a better set of rules to spliting.
#2
Posted 2005-November-03, 06:07
Flame, on Nov 3 2005, 11:31 AM, said:
Assume standard leads and signaling.
Kanter's way is
Q from QJ10
J from J109 or KQJ
With only 2 honors usually dont split but if you do split:
K from AK
Q from KQ
Q from QJ
Looks kind of strange since no rule of either split high or split low.
The Q is most ambigious but the idea is that wht only 2 honors KQ or QJ you usually dont split (also i guess if the ace is seen you can split KQ with the K and avoid this problem).
Still i think there must be a better set of rules to spliting.
Kanter's way is
Q from QJ10
J from J109 or KQJ
With only 2 honors usually dont split but if you do split:
K from AK
Q from KQ
Q from QJ
Looks kind of strange since no rule of either split high or split low.
The Q is most ambigious but the idea is that wht only 2 honors KQ or QJ you usually dont split (also i guess if the ace is seen you can split KQ with the K and avoid this problem).
Still i think there must be a better set of rules to spliting.
For the sake of completeness, this way of splitting honors is suggested by Kantar for SECOND SEAT only.
Playing 3rd/4rth seat, he suggests splitting with the lowest of touching honors, except hlding doubleton HH, when the sequence is reversed.
"Bridge is like dance: technique's important but what really matters is not to step on partner's feet !"
#3 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2005-November-03, 08:50
I split high from 3 honors, low from 2 if I've discussed it. Undiscussed I just split low.
#4
Posted 2005-November-03, 13:28
Jlall, on Nov 3 2005, 09:50 AM, said:
I split high from 3 honors, low from 2 if I've discussed it. Undiscussed I just split low.
Same for me, except that I often also do it when undiscussed, hoping that this is somewhat standard.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.
- hrothgar
- hrothgar
#5
Posted 2005-November-03, 18:14
which honor to split? hell i have trouble remembering to look around for an endplay when i have a finesse
"Paul Krugman is a stupid person's idea of what a smart person sounds like." Newt Gingrich (paraphrased)
#6
Posted 2005-November-03, 20:07
luke warm, on Nov 3 2005, 07:14 PM, said:
which honor to split? hell i have trouble remembering to look around for an endplay when i have a finesse
end play is advace play while knowing how to split (not when to split) is begining skill just like a beginer partner should know if they lead 4th best of 5 best.
I think these easy stuff should come before the other partnership agrement and conventions.
#7
Posted 2005-November-04, 05:33
oh
"Paul Krugman is a stupid person's idea of what a smart person sounds like." Newt Gingrich (paraphrased)
#8
Posted 2005-November-04, 14:06
hahaha, I agree with the young skywalker.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.
- hrothgar
- hrothgar
#9
Posted 2005-November-05, 07:26
not as young as he used to be
time keeps on slippin' slippin' slippin' into the future
time keeps on slippin' slippin' slippin' into the future
"Paul Krugman is a stupid person's idea of what a smart person sounds like." Newt Gingrich (paraphrased)
Page 1 of 1

Help
