BBO Discussion Forums: Rich People have their troubles - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Rich People have their troubles Opener's Re-bid

#41 User is offline   hrothgar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,724
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Natick, MA
  • Interests:Travel
    Cooking
    Brewing
    Hiking

Posted 2005-November-23, 15:02

inquiry, on Nov 23 2005, 11:31 PM, said:

hrothgar, on Nov 23 2005, 03:14 PM, said:

Partner opens 1.  RHO passes. 
You hold

A6
K4
AK8743
643

what's your bid?

Is this a serious question? In SAYC you would bid 2NT with this. Game going hand, 13-15 or so hcp. Perfect? Of course not, but that is the bid.

Personally, I think that 2NT with that hand is an abomination
YMMV.

Lets change the hand slightly

KQ2
542
AK8743
6

Are you still hapy bidding 2NT?
Alderaan delenda est
0

#42 User is offline   Al_U_Card 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,080
  • Joined: 2005-May-16
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2005-November-24, 10:25

Well, my knowledge of Kitchen bridge says "We have D, let's bid D!" so 3 or 4 D as per your definition of invitation (as large as it may be in sayc)
The Grand Design, reflected in the face of Chaos...it's a fluke!
0

#43 User is offline   Gerben42 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,577
  • Joined: 2005-March-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Erlangen, Germany
  • Interests:Astronomy, Mathematics
    Nuclear power

Posted 2005-November-24, 10:41

Quote

I don't see folks going arround bashing Acol in the same way the bash SAYC...


Sure, just in different threads that's all. Do a search on Acol and you'll find plenty of examples.
Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do!
My Bridge Systems Page

BC Kultcamp Rieneck
0

#44 User is offline   mikeh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,670
  • Joined: 2005-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.

Posted 2005-November-24, 12:34

awm, on Nov 21 2005, 10:57 PM, said:

Honestly I don't think many (any?) serious partnerships can completely describe all their agreements in an 8-10 page document.

I am just finishing a system outline for a new partnership with an expert who has previously been playing with someone whose philosophy is akin to Bobby Wolff's: if the treatment was invented after the mid 1960's it is probably not a good idea :P

So I have set out, in point form, a whole systemic outline, with an index and 17 chapters on different topics. It is currently 72 pages in length, not counting the index. At that it is the shortest of three sets of system notes I have: but I know it will be expanding if the partnership takes off.

I heard, years ago, that the Meckwell notes were in excess of 600 pages.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
0

#45 User is offline   Al_U_Card 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,080
  • Joined: 2005-May-16
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2005-November-24, 12:43

mikeh, on Nov 24 2005, 01:34 PM, said:

So I have set out, in point form, a whole systemic outline, with an index and 17 chapters on different topics. It is currently 72 pages in length, not counting the index. At that it is the shortest of three sets of system notes I have: but I know it will be expanding if the partnership takes off.

I sure hope it does, for your sake, as that is a heck of a lot of work for an occasional game.......maybe we'll get to hear of your future successes at the national level
The Grand Design, reflected in the face of Chaos...it's a fluke!
0

  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users