I may be revealing my age, but the S hand is not an opening bid for me.
The problem with opening these hands, outside of a limited opening bid method such as Precision, is that you are fooling partner, who should be entitled to count on your hand contributing a certain minimum amount of defence, and you have none.
Yes, I understand the desire to start getting your suits in, but it's not as if your suits are very good and, most importantly, it is not as if you are automatically barred after starting with a pass. Indeed, there will be many hands on which pass followed by revealing a two-suiter will help partner far more than an original opening bid. In short, I think those who open this (absent a clear agreement with partner that this is an opening bid.. and now you should be announcing this style to the opps) are guilty of the one of the most common of bidding errors: bidding as if bridge were solitaire.
Make the hand xx KJ10xxx KQxxx void, and I personally would still pass but I could live with 1
♥ and, if the partnership style permitted it (I have one partnership that allows this) I'd open 2
♥, if available as a weak two and bid some number of
♦ later if need arose.
Having perpetrated an opening bid, wild horses could not get me to bid over 2
♠.
One thing we know, beyond any reasonable doubt, is that partner has NOT GOT real
♥ support...or else his 2
♣ call was a tactical move and he was going to raise
♥ vigorously next time. When LHO has doubled your 4 loser side suit for penalty, we have a VOID in partner's suit and poor (altho long) trump.... bidding over 2
♠ shows an unwillingness to trust partner......even if partner can't be trusted, not trusting him only perpetuates the problem. And who knows? Had you passed 2
♠, maybe he would have done the right thing.
Will partner EVER pass out 2
♠ when you can make game on your piece of crap? Can 4
♥ really be a good advance save when you hold this hand and partner bid your void?
The one think I can say is that your bidding was consistent in your playing solitaire here: poor partner never had a chance
I am sorry if I offended you with these comments, but you did ask for opinions
And I admire your postings... you show real promise in that your posts are usually about poor results and how to avoid them, rather than about lucky results.. .so I hope you take my expression of views as what it is intended to be: constructive criticism. I learned a lot about the game in sessions in pub after the game or in someone's hotel room at tournaments, and the language used (re my bids and plays, as well as others) was much like the language I used here.... and it was never meant nor is meant by me as a personal criticism.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari