Quote
Brady, 35, was miffed that the Jaguars, whose blocking skills were lauded by coach Jack Del Rio, only offered him a $1.5 million contract with no signing bonus for the upcoming season.
From: Brady to accept Patriots' offer
Is it okay to have "Jaguars, whose blocking skills" since it is clear whose is about Brady?
Quote
He only produced three runs of over 20 yards and lacks the big-play ability that made him a special player. He will receive some play on the open market, but teams should realize their getting a shell of the player he once was.
From: Bust and bargains - Evaluating overrated and underrated free agents
Is "teams should realize their getting a shell of the player" okay since it would be their shell, or should it be "teams should realize they're getting a shell of the player"?
Rosenberg, on March 07 BW, said:
Effectively, I had played nobody for the heart ace.
Should "Effectively" be "essentially" since his play was not effective (as in produce a desired effect), or is it okay as in produce an impression?
Quote
A source said today that the Dolphins are shopping Randy McMichael, who is the franchise's all-time leader in catches (283) and receiving yards (3,096) for a tight end.
From: Dolphins trying to trade TE McMichael
They are not "shopping Randy McMichael ... for a tight end." but instead he is "all-time leader ... for a tight end." Was the sentence okay?
Thanks in advance for comments.