is THIS obvious? surely this is simpler than roger's
#22
Posted 2008-June-24, 13:35
TimG, on Jun 24 2008, 05:12 PM, said:
Sambolino, on Jun 24 2008, 03:54 AM, said:
Won't partner bid 2S with some 42(43) hands?
I prefer not to play negative doubles after 1H-(2C) so that may influence my thinking. But, I would bid 2H.
no dude, NFB shows a goodish suit with 5+ cards
George Carlin
#23
Posted 2008-June-24, 14:16
gwnn, on Jun 24 2008, 02:35 PM, said:
TimG, on Jun 24 2008, 05:12 PM, said:
Sambolino, on Jun 24 2008, 03:54 AM, said:
Won't partner bid 2S with some 42(43) hands?
no dude, NFB shows a goodish suit with 5+ cards
Won't partner bid 2S with some 42(43) hands after Sambolino reopens with a double?
#24
Posted 2008-June-24, 14:19
George Carlin
#25
Posted 2008-June-24, 15:13
The other benefit is when pard is sitting on a penalty pass.
#26
Posted 2008-June-24, 15:49
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#27
Posted 2008-June-24, 16:12
#28
Posted 2008-June-24, 20:01
--Always remember you're unique. Just like everyone else.
#29
Posted 2008-June-24, 22:21
Yes, then I won't quit to 2C, 2D likely good spot if partner bids that, so Double.
He heard my 1H =5xH, I got 1 more. That's not to say I have good hearts AK/AQ/KJ10 6th. KQJ98 5th would bid 2H.
#30
Posted 2008-June-24, 22:47
sathyab, on Jun 24 2008, 11:24 PM, said:
The_Hog, on Jun 24 2008, 09:41 AM, said:
I don't understand why you can't double with this shape. Regardless of the kind of free-bids you play, partner has to pass with a penalty double, right ? The only time you would consider not reopening with a double is when you're looking at length is the overcalled suit, as it makes it unlikely that partner passed with a penalty double.
Because pd will bid 2S with a non penalty x hand and a 4 card S suit. I am not that keen on playing 4-2 fits.
#31 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2008-June-25, 00:15
#32
Posted 2008-June-25, 00:46
Jlall, on Jun 25 2008, 07:15 AM, said:
So are you bidding 2♥ because you want to play there opposite a hand that isn't a penalty pass but couldn't take action over 2♣?
#33 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2008-June-25, 00:53
gnasher, on Jun 25 2008, 01:46 AM, said:
Jlall, on Jun 25 2008, 07:15 AM, said:
So are you bidding 2♥ because you want to play there opposite a hand that isn't a penalty pass but couldn't take action over 2♣?
Yes. Pass vs 2H is closeish but I think 2H is better. I'll let you run the sim lol. Usually with 6H that arent great and Hx of clubs I think pass is right though in this situation, but here I think we have enough HCP where 2C and 2H both make often enough.
#34
Posted 2008-June-25, 01:17
This will win often when partner had no penalty pass and.
And if he had a club suit, we will end in 3 NT anyway, so no big loss. Or do you expect to earn 1100 here with your double?
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#35
Posted 2008-June-25, 01:34
Codo, on Jun 25 2008, 08:17 AM, said:
This will win often when partner had no penalty pass and.
And if he had a club suit, we will end in 3 NT anyway, so no big loss. Or do you expect to earn 1100 here with your double?
If partner has a penalty double of 2♣, I expect it to go down lots. I have a huge hand for defence.
More likely is that partner doesn't actively want to double 2♣, but chooses to pass my double because he has club length and nothing better to do. Opposite as good a defensive hand as this, we might well score 500 with no game on our way.
#36
Posted 2008-June-25, 06:38
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
#37
Posted 2008-June-25, 08:06

Help
