BBO Discussion Forums: wat is wat - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

wat is wat bidding

#1 User is offline   jakob_r 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 37
  • Joined: 2008-March-10
  • Location:Monte Carlo, Monaco
  • Interests:bridge, sailing, dancing

Posted 2008-July-05, 20:13

Playing 2/1 what is the meaning of 3♦ in this auction

1♣-1♥, 1♠-3♣, 3♦-3♥,4♣-a.p.

and is 4♣ passable?

Sorry if im posting in the wrong forum :)
Yesterday I was a dog. Today I'm a dog. Tomorrow I'll probably still be a dog. Sigh! There's so little hope for advancement.
Snoopy
0

#2 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,585
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-July-05, 20:17

jakob_r, on Jul 5 2008, 09:13 PM, said:

Playing 2/1 what is the meaning of 3♦ in this auction

1♣-1♥, 1♠-3♣, 3♦-3♥,4♣-a.p.

and is 4♣ passable?

Sorry if im posting in the wrong forum  :)

I play 3c here is invite, good invite. NOT game force.
3d=cue for 3nt NOT game force.
3H=cue for 3nt NOT game force.
4c=passable but pretty good hand.

If it matters after 3c I play 4d at anytime in auction by either party to be rkc for clubs........
0

#3 User is offline   nige1 

  • 5-level belongs to me
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,128
  • Joined: 2004-August-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Glasgow Scotland
  • Interests:Poems Computers

Posted 2008-July-05, 20:48

jakob_r, on Jul 5 2008, 09:13 PM, said:

Playing 2/1 what is the meaning of 3♦ in this auction
1♣-1♥, 1♠-3♣, 3♦-3♥,4♣-a.p.
and is 4♣ passable?
Sorry if im posting in the wrong forum  :)
I don't know 2/1 :( but since when has ignorance deterred the expression of opinions? :) From first principles :)
  • 3 ♦ = 4th suit asking for a ♦ stop e.g. ♠ Axxx ♥ x ♦ Jxx ♣ AKxxx
  • 3 ♥ = Natural or waiting move in case opener has a ♦ stop after all.
  • 4 ♣ = Natural non-forcing unless 4th suit is game-forcing (as many agree it to be).

Guthrie.tech
0

#4 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2008-July-06, 03:26

mike777, on Jul 6 2008, 03:17 AM, said:

3d=cue for 3nt NOT game force.
3H=cue for 3nt NOT game force.

Have you been spending too much time in Ken's company?
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#5 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2008-July-06, 03:37

3♦ = asking for a diamond stop, denies three hearts
3♥ = denying a diamond stop, showing five decent hearts and suggesting a 5-2 fit
4♣ = to play

I'm not a big fan of auctions that are forcing to game or four of a minor, but it seems sensible that this 4♣ should be non-forcing, because both hands are limited. If 1♠ were forcing, I'd want 4♣ to be forcing too.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#6 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2008-July-06, 03:43

Welcome to the forums Jacob. I agree with gnasher's answer.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#7 User is offline   skjaeran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,727
  • Joined: 2006-June-05
  • Location:Oslo, Norway
  • Interests:Bridge, sports, Sci-fi, fantasy

Posted 2008-July-06, 04:27

han, on Jul 6 2008, 11:43 AM, said:

Welcome to the forums Jacob. I agree with gnasher's answer.

Agree on both counts.
Kind regards,
Harald
0

#8 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2008-July-06, 14:50

Hey! With which gnasher answer do you gentlemen agree?!?!?

:rolleyes:

I mean, I agree with one of them myself. Which makes me disagree with the implication of the other. LOL
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#9 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2008-July-06, 15:02

I agree with exactly one of them. I don't have an opinion on the other.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#10 User is offline   skjaeran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,727
  • Joined: 2006-June-05
  • Location:Oslo, Norway
  • Interests:Bridge, sports, Sci-fi, fantasy

Posted 2008-July-07, 02:39

kenrexford, on Jul 6 2008, 10:50 PM, said:

Hey! With which gnasher answer do you gentlemen agree?!?!?

:rolleyes:

I mean, I agree with one of them myself. Which makes me disagree with the implication of the other. LOL

I agree with the post where he said something bridgewise. I haven't got a clue regarding who's spent (too much or too little) time in your company, Ken! B)
Kind regards,
Harald
0

#11 User is offline   andy_h 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,962
  • Joined: 2007-September-14
  • Location:Australia
  • Interests:The Universe, Traveling, Squash, and Scandinavia.

Posted 2008-July-07, 02:56

gnasher, on Jul 6 2008, 07:37 PM, said:

3♦ = asking for a diamond stop, denies three hearts
3♥ = denying a diamond stop, showing five decent hearts and suggesting a 5-2 fit
4♣ = to play

Agree. Welcome Jakob.  :rolleyes:
- Andy -

We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
0

#12 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,394
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Odense, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2008-July-07, 03:40

Agree with Gnasher.

Suppose opener had something like

Qxxx
Jxx
AQ
AJxx

I.e. a diamond stopper and 3-card hearts support (yes, I know many prefer to rebid 1NT with this hand but suppose ftsota that we play up-the-line). Then I think opener should bid 3♥. Responder can then temporize with 3♠ to find 3NT.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users