Yikes Andy_H is evil
#1
Posted 2009-March-25, 17:59
♠AK8732
♥K2
♦AJ
♣KQ3
LHO opens 2♥ Weak, Partner passes and RHO bids 3NT... What's your plan?
#4
Posted 2009-March-25, 19:57
bill1157, on Mar 25 2009, 08:36 PM, said:
Bill
You won't be on lead unless the opponents are nuts and sit this out.
Double and then spades.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#5
Posted 2009-March-25, 20:18
Phil, on Mar 25 2009, 08:57 PM, said:
bill1157, on Mar 25 2009, 08:36 PM, said:
Bill
You won't be on lead unless the opponents are nuts and sit this out.
Double and then spades.
why? is 3nt a ♥raise or something? sounds like to play. and X is takeout? Doesnt sound like we would mesh very well as partners...
Bill
#6
Posted 2009-March-25, 20:45
bill1157, on Mar 25 2009, 09:18 PM, said:
Phil, on Mar 25 2009, 08:57 PM, said:
bill1157, on Mar 25 2009, 08:36 PM, said:
Bill
You won't be on lead unless the opponents are nuts and sit this out.
Double and then spades.
why? is 3nt a ♥raise or something? sounds like to play. and X is takeout? Doesnt sound like we would mesh very well as partners...
Bill
No 3N is not a heart raise but its 200 to 1 that RHO is jokering and will pull to 4♥.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#7
Posted 2009-March-25, 21:11
I don't blame you for being so shocked that anyone would pass that you assumed he doubled though

#8
Posted 2009-March-25, 21:15
JLOL, on Mar 25 2009, 10:11 PM, said:
I don't blame you for being so shocked that anyone would pass that you assumed he doubled though

Yeah he did LOL. Never occurred to me someone would sell out to 3N.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#9
Posted 2009-March-26, 03:50
#10
Posted 2009-March-26, 04:13
#11
Posted 2009-March-26, 04:29
Gerben42, on Mar 26 2009, 10:13 AM, said:
Thought about that, but what if pard happens to have a few high cards? He would never move on if you don't double first.
#12
Posted 2009-March-26, 06:29
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#13
Posted 2009-March-26, 06:53
♠Q64
♥Q7
♦KQT9
♣AJ42
Should he go on?
------------ (2♥) - P
(3NT) - X - P - P
(4♥) - 4♠ - P - ?
#14
Posted 2009-March-26, 07:14
Bill
#15
Posted 2009-March-26, 07:18
#16
Posted 2009-March-26, 07:49
I bid 5 Club, showing a control.
Or do you really need this pid to show a weak hand with long clubs? I doubt it, but in this case, bid 5 Spade and pass partners rebid.
When 5 ♠ askes for trump quality or something weird, bid a simple 6 Spade and pray.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#17
Posted 2009-March-26, 07:52
Phil, on Mar 25 2009, 08:57 PM, said:
bill1157, on Mar 25 2009, 08:36 PM, said:
Bill
You won't be on lead unless the opponents are nuts and sit this out.
Double and then spades.
Ummm, If I was your opp, I would be happy to claim -450, vs. your 680/1430. So there is nothing "nuts" about sitting it out, undoubled.
(however, if you double, you wont be on lead, because now they will not sit for it.)

edit: I didn't read any further than your original post b4 posting this, I see Justin pointed this out already now.

So many experts, not enough X cards.
#18
Posted 2009-March-26, 07:55
mtvesuvius, on Mar 26 2009, 07:53 AM, said:
♠Q64
♥Q7
♦KQT9
♣AJ42
Should he go on?
------------ (2♥) - P
(3NT) - X - P - P
(4♥) - 4♠ - P - ?
Yes.
5♣
So many experts, not enough X cards.
#19
Posted 2009-March-26, 08:16
helene_t, on Mar 26 2009, 01:18 PM, said:
Well, I happen to have it, so I'd use it: 5♠ it is then.
The double of 3NT usually shows 16+ hcp and could easily be more. With 14 across to boot, a slam try is normal.
#20
Posted 2009-March-26, 08:42
whereagles, on Mar 26 2009, 05:29 AM, said:
Gerben42, on Mar 26 2009, 10:13 AM, said:
Thought about that, but what if pard happens to have a few high cards? He would never move on if you don't double first.
Even n00bishly trying to concoct a hand where 3NT is values and somewhat of a gamble I can't do it. That means RHO is a joker, and that means MHO isn't broke, right?
"gwnn" said:
hanp does not always mean literally what he writes.