What do you open?
#21
Posted 2009-May-16, 22:05
#22
Posted 2009-May-16, 22:45
Phil, on May 16 2009, 09:05 PM, said:
hanp, on May 16 2009, 08:56 PM, said:
There's a little cult of LTC fanatics that think a 1N opening is supposed to have 6 losers.
I have no idea what the source of this thinking is.
So what do they do with hands like Axxx Axx Axx Axx? That's 8 losers from what I've been told, 1 more than the hand in question.
#23
Posted 2009-May-16, 23:29
hanp, on May 17 2009, 04:45 AM, said:
Phil, on May 16 2009, 09:05 PM, said:
hanp, on May 16 2009, 08:56 PM, said:
There's a little cult of LTC fanatics that think a 1N opening is supposed to have 6 losers.
I have no idea what the source of this thinking is.
So what do they do with hands like Axxx Axx Axx Axx? That's 8 losers from what I've been told, 1 more than the hand in question.
With that, they downgrade for having 4 aces, and then for being 4333 so open 1C then rebid 1N
ps I also open the OP 1N, won't be comfortable with some auctions after 1C.
#24
Posted 2009-May-17, 04:35
hanp, on May 17 2009, 05:45 AM, said:
Phil, on May 16 2009, 09:05 PM, said:
hanp, on May 16 2009, 08:56 PM, said:
There's a little cult of LTC fanatics that think a 1N opening is supposed to have 6 losers.
I have no idea what the source of this thinking is.
So what do they do with hands like Axxx Axx Axx Axx? That's 8 losers from what I've been told, 1 more than the hand in question.
No, an ace subtracts one and a half loser unless it's sec so that's 6 losers.
Anyway, of course the rule is not a good criterion for opening, but maybe it makes some sense for responder to assume appr. 6 losers when deciding whether to bid game after having found a fit.
#25
Posted 2009-May-17, 05:44
Counting doubleton queens as 0hcp, at least when opening, is taking pessimism too far.
Nick
#26
Posted 2009-May-17, 05:59
#27
Posted 2009-May-17, 09:12
hanp, on May 16 2009, 08:56 PM, said:
LoL. Spot on.
Leave it to me to search out the "and by the way there is also this" reasoning.

Help
