Seven four
#1
Posted 2009-May-31, 07:22
A
ATxx
x
AQJTxxx
Uncontested:
1♠ - 2♣
2♦ - ?
What's your plan to show this hand? (how about if 1♠ was limited to 15 HCP?)
#3
Posted 2009-May-31, 10:38
bill1157, on May 31 2009, 09:35 AM, said:
a 2H rebid, here is not because of a possible heart fit, but rather to discover pattern of the opening bid. In our methods, most hands with a club fit would have raised clubs the first time. But if Pard is starting to pattern up with 5-1-4-3, i certainly don't want to get in his way.
#4
Posted 2009-June-01, 13:27
If partner bids 2♠ or 2NT we have an easy 3♣ rebid, and if partner does something else then that will be much more descriptive then it would have been over 3♣.
#5
Posted 2009-June-01, 13:42
aguahombre, on May 31 2009, 11:38 AM, said:
bill1157, on May 31 2009, 09:35 AM, said:
a 2H rebid, here is not because of a possible heart fit, but rather to discover pattern of the opening bid. In our methods, most hands with a club fit would have raised clubs the first time. But if Pard is starting to pattern up with 5-1-4-3, i certainly don't want to get in his way.
Exactly !! 2♥ for me also.
#6
Posted 2009-June-01, 13:45
#7
Posted 2009-June-01, 13:55
mtvesuvius, on Jun 1 2009, 02:45 PM, said:
If partner is also of the school that doesnt jump around, especially in NT without extras in a game forcing auction, I would think he has 5-3-4-1 distribution with about 18 or 19 HCP.
Next move? 4C..kk for clubs. maybe he has the stiff king.
#9
Posted 2009-June-02, 03:40
2. Same thing playing precision.
Willing to bury slam here.
#10
Posted 2009-June-02, 06:53
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#11
Posted 2009-June-02, 06:55
mtvesuvius, on Jun 1 2009, 02:45 PM, said:
Heart stopper, since for me 2H is FSF.
This means it is very likely that partner has only a single club,
which is a minus factor.
I would pass, espeially if 1S was limited.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#12
Posted 2009-June-02, 07:53
mtvesuvius, on Jun 1 2009, 03:45 PM, said:
4♣ to show partner the nature of your hand. If he bids 4NT over this, I'm done. If he cuebids 4♦, we're getting to at least 6♣.
#13
Posted 2009-June-02, 08:36
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#14
Posted 2009-June-02, 08:44
Codo, on Jun 2 2009, 09:36 AM, said:
partner didnt bid 2nt after i bid 2H --she bid 3NT. Jumps in notrump should not be fast arrival. therefore partner is already "excited". Time to take over the hand with whatever keycard method you have for Clubs to ferret out the stiff king and bid the grand. 4C is that method for us.
#15
Posted 2009-June-09, 10:17
Playing sayc, 3♣ would be NF 100%, so you're forced into 2♥, 4th.
Playing 2/1, 2♥ is an option, but I don't really see what good id does; I much prefer 3♣.
This being IMPs, I'll bid 4♣ over prd' 3nt indicating slam desire, but may stop in 5♣ if prd. does not cooperate.
It's really really hard to stop short of slam on this powerfull hand even opposite a hand limited to 15 HCP.
#16
Posted 2009-June-09, 14:07
Apollo81, on Jun 2 2009, 07:27 AM, said:
For example PASS over 3♣ wouldn't be very useful.
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#17
Posted 2009-June-09, 18:42
Codo, on Jun 2 2009, 09:36 PM, said:
I agree with Roland's comments here. I cannot see any reason for not bidding 2H on this. You can show the nature of the C suit later.
#18
Posted 2009-June-10, 09:48

Help
