Another ridiculous ruling just for a whine
#21
Posted 2010-August-23, 13:20
...with disabled, seniors, bidding boxes, touchpads, etc; in the mix, it's surely less than a 100% state of affairs.
The "intention" when leading towards the AQ is to play the Q unless the K shows. If a fast or even unexpected K results in a timely correction via a (rules-allowed or tournament-allowed) claim of mis-speak or mis-click, insisting otherwise as an opp deserves some adjectives not allowed in this forum.
On a hopefully friendlier helpful note, maye try to think of it as a typo. We know the word we want to communicate. We have an idea of it's spelling that when executed, will be our final choice or corrected if we type too fast or it doesn't somehow come out or look right. Would you deny someone the opportunity to correct the typo because they weren't 100% "on"?
#22
Posted 2010-August-23, 14:07
jillybean, on Aug 23 2010, 01:52 PM, said:
OTOH, I you want to play a game where people can take back a card played when they realise they could have won the trick, thats fine and you will have a lot of supporters.
I admit I agree with jillybean. Bridge is a game where mistakes typically cost and those who make fewest of them usually do well. If it is practice game or just for fun, fine, undo all we want (and I allow undo if I am host). But with any sort of stakes, even if it is just for monsterpoints, live with our mistakes whether live bridge or online.
#23
Posted 2010-August-23, 17:25
#24
Posted 2010-August-23, 18:03
I had a longtime partner, now deceased, on Okbridge who was very arthritic and slow. We knew better than to enter tournaments, which would only be frustrating for him in terms of time allowed and undo's. But, we enjoyed several years of fun bridge at our own open table allowing undo's and slow play - we always had a full table.
Of course this has nothing to do with the opening post, where it sounds to me like the director probably didn't even consider the situation, just granted the undo.
Practice Goodwill and Active Ethics
Director "Please"!
#25
Posted 2010-August-23, 18:18
#26
Posted 2010-August-23, 18:55
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
Our ultimate goal on defense is to know by trick two or three everyone's hand at the table. -- Mike777
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
#28
Posted 2010-August-23, 19:03
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
Our ultimate goal on defense is to know by trick two or three everyone's hand at the table. -- Mike777
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
#29
Posted 2010-August-24, 01:52
#31
Posted 2010-August-24, 23:02
And in a goulash tourney, it seems to me that you should be extra watchful. By definition, you don't expect suits to break nicely, so you have to be on the lookout for unexpected ruffs at all times.
But on the other hand, when you enter a goulash, you shouldn't expect a high level of bridge. These are silly tournaments just for a laugh, don't get too hung up on them.
#32
Posted 2010-August-24, 23:27
barmar, on Aug 25 2010, 12:02 AM, said:
What SHOULD BE most likely is that if someone says they misclicked, in a timely notification, and it is feasible, do not call them a liar.
Maybe record it, and if it happens sufficiently, start assuming otherwise. Or give them fair warning they will not be awarded undo's any more.
Further, I wish TDs even in BBO FREE-for-all's understood recording and did it. The other day, a "world class" pair from the same overseas country with similar profile, playing precision, balanced in 2C after 1S p p, with 2C, on Jtxxx of C and 7 HCP.
We competed to 2S but with KJx Axx Axx Q9xx their partner sold out, and it was right.
I privately askd the TD to review the auction and possibly record the board. The TD couldn't understand why I asked that, or even what I was asking, even with several explanations. They kept replying "I see nothing illegal here".
#33
Posted 2010-August-24, 23:37
jkdood, on Aug 25 2010, 01:27 AM, said:
barmar, on Aug 25 2010, 12:02 AM, said:
What SHOULD BE most likely is that if someone says they misclicked, in a timely notification, and it is feasible, do not call them a liar.
I wish I lived in that world. But here in the real world, most so-called "misclicks" are actually playing too quickly and not paying attention.
And unless BBO has a recorder system in place, where do you expect TDs to record these things?
#34
Posted 2010-August-24, 23:46
barmar, on Aug 25 2010, 12:37 AM, said:
Uhh in a PC text file .txt?
#35
Posted 2010-August-25, 05:01
blackshoe, on Aug 23 2010, 06:00 PM, said:
I said it first time in 2002 and many time since. Let the UNDO button be greyed out for normal play and keep it for only vugraph operators and teaching tables. Live with your misclicks like you must live with your errors in real life.
Roland
#36
Posted 2010-August-25, 05:17
Walddk, on Aug 25 2010, 12:01 PM, said:
blackshoe, on Aug 23 2010, 06:00 PM, said:
I said it first time in 2002 and many time since. Let the UNDO button be greyed out for normal play and keep it for only vugraph operators and teaching tables. Live with your misclicks like you must live with your errors in real life.
Roland
I agree, although you might want to keep the choice in the relaxed bridge room.
#37
Posted 2010-August-25, 06:06
jkdood, on Aug 25 2010, 01:46 AM, said:
barmar, on Aug 25 2010, 12:37 AM, said:
Uhh in a PC text file .txt?
I was thinking that the record should be shared among all the different tourneys to have a hope of noticing a pattern.
#38
Posted 2010-August-25, 11:32
barmar, on Aug 25 2010, 07:06 AM, said:
Good idea.
I volunteer:
Send me your text files I will do an NDA (non-disclosure form) and then collate and run a match program and send back updates.

Help
