Partner hit me big-time. Now what? Responder's rebid playing 2/1 with Wk NT
#1
Posted 2010-October-18, 13:10
Opps: not bad, both claim to be experts- i don't dispute their claims.
Vulnerabiity: Both White
Your hand: ♠: VOID, ♥: AJ4, ♦: KT96, ♣: QT9543 (Spot cards are correct)
Opponents Pass throughout. You are playing BBO adv 2/1 with Wk NTs
Bidding: Partner deals and bids 1 spade, You respond 1NT (f - 1: any disagreements with 1NT?) Partner rebids two Clubs. Your Bid!!!!
Thank you all in advance
DHL
#2
Posted 2010-October-18, 13:34
#4
Posted 2010-October-18, 15:15
nigel_k, on Oct 18 2010, 02:34 PM, said:
I have a lot sympathy for your call but think you need to cut partner a tiny bit of slack and give him an out if he opened a truly ugly hand so 4♣ for me
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#5
Posted 2010-October-18, 18:13
"Learn from the mistakes of others. You won't live long enough to make them all yourself."
"One advantage of bad bidding is that you get practice at playing atrocious contracts."
-Alfred Sheinwold
#6
Posted 2010-October-18, 18:27
chasetb, on Oct 18 2010, 07:13 PM, said:
How about showing diamonds?
#7
Posted 2010-October-18, 18:45
To Gonzalo: I judged the hand to be too good for a 3C bid.
fwiw: i selected to rebid 3NT but will wait before exposing the success or lack thereof the bid.
DHL
#8
Posted 2010-October-18, 18:51
I think 3♣ is quite appropriate, although you may feel having something in reserve. 3NT is very poor.
#9
Posted 2010-October-20, 03:34
#10
Posted 2010-October-20, 04:38
Double !, on 2010-October-18, 18:45, said:
I also think its an underbid, but the lack of forcing bids below 3NT make me make teh descriptive bid.
I have sympath for 3NT, but if partner has some 5-5 and is not on your wavelenght you might play a stupid contract.
On the other hand going over 3NT when partner can have 3 clubs can be very wrong.
#11
Posted 2010-October-20, 17:28
1s=1nt=2c=2d! asks partner to describe hand further and is art. so :
common would be:
1s=1nt
2c=2d!
2h(2-3 h/not extras)=3c( roughly 12-13 with 5+clubs)...
BART convention...very common usage.
#12
Posted 2010-October-20, 18:14
#13
Posted 2010-October-21, 01:44
keylime, on 2010-October-20, 18:14, said:
Any reason why you use that aweful huge font?
#15
Posted 2010-October-21, 06:49
Is 3NT really as bad as everyone is saying? We will almost certainly get a red suit lead which could be helpful. OK a heart lead with the honors divided will probably sink us, but who knows, partner might have one of them, or even ♥Tx will be good for a second stopper. Besides that, spade wastage (KJxxx, yuuuuuck) is going to hurt us in any contract, why not play for 9 tricks instead of 10 or 11?
-gwnn
#16
Posted 2010-October-21, 08:14
#17
Posted 2010-October-21, 08:42
Does it not make sense for the same to be true for a 3♥ bid if the auction begins 1♠ - 1NT* - 2m? Admittedly, the 3♥ bid forces the auction to 3NT or 4 of the minor. But is that too much to ask? Surely the 3♥ rebid has no other use.
If you play BART (or any other gadget usage of the 2♦ rebid), you can solve this problem when the minor suit bid is clubs. But neither BART nor any other artificial use of the 2♦ rebid is "standard."
#18
Posted 2010-October-21, 12:50
I rebid 3NT under the following hypotheses: 1) If P only has 3 clubs, then I might still be able to run the suit with one loser as I have a few entries to my hand, 2) The hcps that P lacks in clubs might be located in her bid suit, spades, wasted for a club contract, not NT, or scattered around (also more beneficial in NT). HCP aren't as important on this hand as the potential of setting up the clubs and then running them in NT. So, no, I disagree with a position that NT is not a playable consideration on this hand.
Indeed, 3NT was cold on any lead (9 off the top) as opener's hand was as follows: ♠ Jxxxx, ♥ x, ♦ Axx, ♣ AK98.
Opener likely isn't moving over 3NT. She might or might not take another bid after 3C by me but, with the yucky spade suit, might be concerned about getting too high even tho we could probably gotten out at 4C if need be.
all the matchpoints to you for getting to 6C. even 5C might beat 3NT as you make + 420 (beating + 400).
Fun Hand...aka PIA
Thanks all
DHL
#19
Posted 2010-October-21, 14:16
Double 1, on 2010-October-21, 12:50, said:
Fun Hand...aka PIA
The OP said IMP pairs, not matchpoints.
What lead did you get against 3NT? A heart I presume?
-gwnn
#20
Posted 2010-October-25, 21:55