1♣-(P)-1♠-(X)
XX
Playing 2/1 if that matters. An infrequent partner and I had a disagreement about whether redouble here would standardly show [a] spade support or [b] extra strength and no clear direction. Or is there some [c] answer?
Page 1 of 1
Redouble by opener What does this show?
#2
Posted 2010-November-03, 01:40
bd71, on 2010-November-03, 00:36, said:
1♣-(P)-1♠-(X)
XX
Playing 2/1 if that matters. An infrequent partner and I had a disagreement about whether redouble here would standardly show [a] spade support or [b] extra strength and no clear direction. Or is there some [c] answer?
XX
Playing 2/1 if that matters. An infrequent partner and I had a disagreement about whether redouble here would standardly show [a] spade support or [b] extra strength and no clear direction. Or is there some [c] answer?
Both styles [a]/[b] are playable, although [a] is better phrased as XX = showing 3 card support,
so that a direct raise to 2S showes 4 card support.
We currently play XX as showing add. strength, but we also play a weak NT, so the frequency of being
able to make the XX is ok, if you play strong NT, opener cant have the bal. 15-17 hand any more, so
the frequency for the XX drops.
As a consequence - in a strong NT system playing [a] will be more useful than playing [b].
It may also make sense to play XX as transfer.
With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#3
Posted 2010-November-03, 04:34
Playing Support Doubles , this Redouble shows 3 card Sp support ( regardless of strength ); a Sp raise would show 4 cards with the level depending on strength.
Don Stenmark
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall
" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh
K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall
" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh
K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
#4
Posted 2010-November-03, 07:26
The (old) standard meaning is probably cards, something like 18/19 balanced looking to penalize the opponents.
Almost everyone now plays support redoubles in this auction though. That's what I'd assume playing 2/1 without discussion.
Almost everyone now plays support redoubles in this auction though. That's what I'd assume playing 2/1 without discussion.
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#5
Posted 2010-November-03, 11:04
if you have not agreed to play support x xx the xx here will generally show an unbalanced hand with extra values (say 16+) with almost assuredly spades as a short suit or a more balanced hand with 18+. All of the other hand combinations are relatively easy to show via 1n 2c 2s 2n 3n or even 2d/2h.
#6
Posted 2010-November-03, 12:54
At least in North America, support double is a very popular convention, but it is still marked as red (alertable) on the convention card. The way I see it, if we haven't discussed anything, I would not assume that we play any alertable conventions.
#7
Posted 2010-November-03, 13:04
Old-style meaning = strong hand with good defence.
Most common current meaning = 3 spades.
Another possible meaning is xxx in spades (with Hxx show support directly)
Most common current meaning = 3 spades.
Another possible meaning is xxx in spades (with Hxx show support directly)
(-: Zel :-)
Page 1 of 1