One solution suggested is to tighten up every bit of wording by putting everything intended in detail and quadrupling the length of the Orange book. While I have been editor, every Orange book I have ever produced has been criticised for two reasons:
- too long, and
- not enough detail
![:ph34r:](http://www.bridgebase.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/ph34r.gif)
The EBU has not "licensed" conventions since about 1995. They have not regulated systems since about 1989. So the term "EBU system licensing" seems curiously inappropriate.
![:ph34r:](http://www.bridgebase.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/ph34r.gif)
Why has my spellchekka gone mad?
One solution suggested is to tighten up every bit of wording by puttineverythingng intended idetailla nd quadrupling tlengthth of tOrangege book. While i have beeeditoror, every Orange book i have ever produced has been criticised for two reasons:
The EBU has not "licensed" sconventionscnventions since about 1995. They have not regulated systems since about 1989. So the term "EBU system licensing" seems curiously inappropriate.
![:ph34r:](http://www.bridgebase.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/ph34r.gif)
It has got worse. When I am editing a reply, if I want to see the whole thread I click on the link offering this. In the past that left the editing screen unchanged and produces the full thread separately. Now it gets rid of the reply I have carefully written. Suggestions?