JLOGIC, on 2011-September-01, 00:12, said:
How do you still not get it. I (and I presume han) think the chance of ii is 0>x<.0000000000001
No one is leading stiff 9. And WTF at iii, 9 from J9xxx...ok I'll go with about the same as ii.
As far as RHO cashing the heart, obviously it depends on how good they are, but there is definitely a very good chance that they won't. I would estimate this as much higher than i (lead from KJ9 of hearts).
No one is leading stiff 9. And WTF at iii, 9 from J9xxx...ok I'll go with about the same as ii.
As far as RHO cashing the heart, obviously it depends on how good they are, but there is definitely a very good chance that they won't. I would estimate this as much higher than i (lead from KJ9 of hearts).
We can agree to differ on (i). Bear in mind that it is not the a priori odds that we need, but the odds as adjusted in light of bidding and lead.
I agree with your estimate of (iii). I would not expect that to have a significant effect on the calculation. I included it for completeness. I do not rely on it and do not insist on it. It was included purely for completeness to ensure that all options add up to a probability of 1.
We can also agree to differ on the relative likelihood of West underleading HK compared with East failing to cash the King. Even if you think that lead from King is more likely (I do not), I remain of the view that "just awful" is pure hyperbole.