multi unfavourable second position
#1
Posted 2012-January-17, 15:44
♥97xx
♦KQx
♣xx
(pass)-2♦-(pass)-??
2♦=weak 2 in a major
We are Vul, they aren't, IMPs, RHO hesitates before pass.
#2
Posted 2012-January-17, 16:07
RHO will be hesitating rest of the time, his train went already .
#3
Posted 2012-January-17, 16:24
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#4
Posted 2012-January-17, 16:26
#6
Posted 2012-January-17, 17:31
2D! - 2NT! ("ask" )
.. 3C! = Max weak-2 in a major; 3D!= relay, bid the major you don't have .
.. 3D! = Min weak-2 in ♥ ( transfer )
.. 3H! = Min weak-2 in ♠ ( transfer )
.. 3S! = A K Q .. solid ♥
..3NT! = A K Q .. solid ♠
The question is whether Responder is strong enough to "ask" and then go to game if a Max in ♠.
However, with a max in ♥, I think I would rather not be in game.
But the above structure won't allow a sign-off in 3H when Opener shows a max in ♥ ( with a 3S! bid ) .
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall
" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh
K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
#7
Posted 2012-January-17, 17:48
Really only interested in spades here (hoping for partner to have 6 spades w/ KQ and 9-11 pts.
Probably bid 2H and if your partners suit is spades I would go up to game.
(Assuming 2H is a simple weak bid)...
Junior - Always looking for new partners to improve my play with..I have my fair share of brilliancy and blunders.
"Did your mother really marry a Mr Head and name her son Richard?" - jillybean
#8
Posted 2012-January-18, 03:31
RunemPard, on 2012-January-17, 17:48, said:
Really only interested in spades here (hoping for partner to have 6 spades w/ KQ and 9-11 pts.
Probably bid 2H and if your partners suit is spades I would go up to game.
(Assuming 2H is a simple weak bid)...
What style of multi do you play? If it is weak only, I would bid 4♥ p/c. If you could have lots of strong hands, 2♥ or 2NT to see what partner has.
#9
Posted 2012-January-18, 15:08
TWO4BRIDGE, on 2012-January-17, 17:31, said:
2D! - 2NT! ("ask" )
.. 3C! = Max weak-2 in a major; 3D!= relay, bid the major you don't have .
.. 3D! = Min weak-2 in ♥ ( transfer )
.. 3H! = Min weak-2 in ♠ ( transfer )
.. 3S! = A K Q .. solid ♥
..3NT! = A K Q .. solid ♠
The question is whether Responder is strong enough to "ask" and then go to game if a Max in ♠.
However, with a max in ♥, I think I would rather not be in game.
But the above structure won't allow a sign-off in 3H when Opener shows a max in ♥ ( with a 3S! bid ) .
Why assume that 2NT is an 'ask' by responder?
It's more efficient to play that 2NT is a puppet to 3C, for responder to describe their hand, and that 3C asks for suit and min/max
#10
Posted 2012-January-18, 16:00
Quote
I am not sure. I think hands which want to describe themselves opposite multi are relatively rare and hands which wants to ask about stuff like strength, suit quality etc are frequent, you also want to right side the contract.
I would be happy with 2N ask and 3C puppet.
#11
Posted 2012-January-19, 05:35
♠xxx
♥AKJ10xx
♦Jxx
♣x
I bid 3♥ and passed 4♣ for -130 losed 5 to 5♣-1
#12
Posted 2012-January-19, 06:23
I've been observing his trend. Might very well revise my weak 2 responses.
#13
Posted 2012-January-19, 13:23
AKQxxx
?
?
KQxxxx
x
?
?
+A elsewhere and game is good, and the 3 level is fairly safe . So it all depend of what are you enquiry responses are. Not obvious. Sometimes bidding a chicken 2H and depending on where the opps compete you reevaluate your hand but here its not really possible since if they compete in clubs partner will be more likely to have 2C than a stiff club.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#14
Posted 2012-January-19, 16:07
whereagles, on 2012-January-17, 16:26, said:
{hand posted with club singleton}
whereagles, on 2012-January-19, 06:23, said: