BBO Discussion Forums: Transfer Walsh - ACBL GCC Compatible ?! - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Transfer Walsh - ACBL GCC Compatible ?!

#1 User is offline   steve2005 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,150
  • Joined: 2010-April-22
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hamilton, Canada
  • Interests:Bridge duh!

Posted 2012-May-28, 15:59

I was considering switching to Transfer Walsh over 1 opening
1=, 1= etc.
but i dont think it is allowed by ACBL GCC. Am i right about this?

This seems so silly its just a transfer everyone knows how to handle transfers.
Sarcasm is a state of mind
1

#2 User is offline   glen 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,637
  • Joined: 2003-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ottawa, Canada
  • Interests:Military history, WW II wargames

Posted 2012-May-28, 16:31

View Poststeve2005, on 2012-May-28, 15:59, said:

I was considering switching to Transfer Walsh over 1 opening
1=, 1= etc.
but i dont think it is allowed by ACBL GCC. Am i right about this?

This seems so silly its just a transfer everyone knows how to handle transfers.

yes
'I hit my peak at seven' Taylor Swift
0

#3 User is offline   barmar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 21,422
  • Joined: 2004-August-21
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-May-28, 16:36

What does it mean to "know how to handle" transfers? Most players are used to transfers being used after 1NT, when opener's hand is pretty well defined. Things are different after a 1-level opening, when opener's hand can be anywhere from 11 to 21 HCP.

Anyway, it looks like transfer response are allowed in Mid-Chart, but not GCC. They're only allowed in GCC if they promise game forcing or better values.

#4 User is online   PrecisionL 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 943
  • Joined: 2004-March-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Knoxville, TN, USA
  • Interests:Diamond LM (6700+ MP)
    God
    Family
    Counseling
    Bridge

Posted 2012-May-28, 17:38

Well, if your 1 opening bid promises 15+ hcp and is forcing, then you can play Transfer Responses (i.e. The Millennium Club by Lyle Poe) in GCC events.
Ultra Relay: see Daniel's web page: https://bridgewithda...19/07/Ultra.pdf
C3: Copious Canape Club is still my favorite system. (Ultra upgraded, PM for notes)

Santa Fe Precision published 8/19. TOP3 published 11/20. Magic experiment (Science Modernized) with Lenzo. 2020: Jan Eric Larsson's Cottontail . 2020. BFUN (Bridge For the UNbalanced) 2021: Weiss Simplified (Canape & Relay). 2022: Canary Modernized, 2023-4: KOK Canape.
1

#5 User is offline   paulg 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,058
  • Joined: 2003-April-26
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Scottish Borders

Posted 2012-May-29, 01:24

Definitely Mid-Chart but you do not need to provide a defense as it is covered by the constructive responses exemption. However you do need to have a written description of your methods available for the opponents.

I was pretty sure that the BOD or Conventions Committee had discussed making transfer responses GCC in the past year or two but cannot find it with a quick search of their minutes - but I recall that it was rejected so presumably will not happen in the near future.
The Beer Card

I don't work for BBO and any advice is based on my BBO experience over the decades
0

#6 User is offline   buff 

  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: 2012-June-01

Posted 2012-June-01, 19:06

I've used them for years in Toronto clubs with no complaints, and permitted by club owners. In mid-chart events, we pre-alert and provide a defense which saves time. Some directors in GC events let us play them if we ask permission beforehand. I've played against them in GC events with no pre-alert and the opps have said nobody really cares, what with all the club systems and Montreal relays etc.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users