Double would be card-showing.
Three-card support
#1
Posted 2012-October-24, 17:01
Double would be card-showing.
#3
Posted 2012-October-24, 18:16
Trusting partner to have sound overcall with few or no values in ♦. 2As, ♣K and ♠QJ are not too much to ask for. 5♥ seems safe, but partner doesn't know I have a 5 loser with good trumps.
AK7 looks like 4-card support. Hoping it plays that way.
Trust demands integrity, balance and collaboration.
District 11
Unit 124
Steve Moese
#4
Posted 2012-October-24, 18:42
#5
Posted 2012-October-24, 22:26
#6
Posted 2012-October-24, 23:36
Quote
AJxx QJxxxx x Kx
#7
Posted 2012-October-25, 00:35
It is hard to construct hands for partner that make it a bad slam. (bluecalm did his very best and just managed, congrats
It is also unlikely that we have a grand. Partner seems to have a singleton diamond. Odds are that it is not the ace.
Rik
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
#8
Posted 2012-November-01, 12:47
very nice hand. First things first there is no decent mechanism available for finding 7 so
our only real problem is how high do we go. I agree with fluffy that it is difficult to imagine
a 3h bid that wont give us decent play for
6h
so that is what I am bidding. P will not know what to do missing the AK trumps even if they
have all of the controls and extra values (though they might get excited if they have a dia void
and we didnt bid 6d).
#9
Posted 2012-November-01, 12:51
Having decided not to bid slam, I chose to double instead, thinking that we'd get 300 or 500 with 5♥ not necessarily cold. Also, if partner did remove it I could bid slam with more confidence. RHO had ♣K, so superficially it was also a good move not to bid 5♥.
In fact, though, the opposing hands were A xxx Kxxxx Kxxx and 10xxxx xx AQ10xxx -. The correct action was to save in 5♥.
#10
Posted 2012-November-01, 13:06
I would be two down in 6 Hearts like many others too. As much as I like the brave bid from partner- he has no other bid- I guess it is bad luck to find him with such a bad hand for us. He surely had bid the same way with Ax in spades instead of Jx....
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#11
Posted 2012-November-01, 14:08
#12
Posted 2012-November-01, 14:27
Fluffy, on 2012-November-01, 14:08, said:
I'd certainly have opened partner's hand, but not sure whether I'd have found 3♥ (unless I'd hesitated long enough to embarrass partner before realising I was passing).
#13
Posted 2012-November-03, 07:07
gnasher, on 2012-November-01, 12:51, said:
Today BBO often posts hand histories from matches of the experts. Staying out of slam is right much more than 50% of the time. Whatever the range for partner's bid. Partner seems to usually be at the bottom. Sometimes he has less than the bottom. On my own unscientific(small sample size) study, when one team bids slam and the other didn't, the team not in slam won more imps.
#14
Posted 2012-November-03, 12:21
But my double would be card-showing: 2+ diamond losers.
So my partner knows I have 0-1 diamond with some stuff.
#15
Posted 2012-November-04, 05:06

Help
