Your action?
Page 1 of 1
4 Level Action
#1
Posted 2013-February-25, 06:54
Swiss Teams, IMPs converted to victory points. NS vul, Dealer W.
Your action?
Your action?
#2
Posted 2013-February-25, 07:09
For me: Dbl > 4♦ > pass. But I wouldn't blame anyone for making any of these 3 calls.
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
#3
Posted 2013-February-25, 07:11
with this honnors short going to ruff maybe 4M is not great on a 5-3 fit, but partner might not want to introduce a weak 6 carder over 4♦ so not sure if double or 4♦ is best. I would double at the table.
#4
Posted 2013-February-25, 07:59
I'll bid my seven card suit, thank you.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.
- hrothgar
- hrothgar
#5
Posted 2013-February-25, 08:30
I would bid 4♦. I dont mind a DBL, however, I am afraid to end in a 4-3 4♥, whereas 5♦ might be cold. But anyway with hands like this one just flip a coint and make your choice
#6
Posted 2013-February-25, 19:42
Double has several ways to win:
1) LHO might go overboard in raising ♣s
2) Partner might have a 5-card major
3) Partner has a 4-card major and the Moysian works
4) Partner has 4♦ (it can happen!)
5) Partner has a ♣ stack (yes, even under the ♣ bidder).
4♦ wins whenever partner can raise, or when 4 is the limit for our side. It loses whenever partner fails to bid a major or holds clubs. While we do have a 7-card suit, we won't find playable 4-3 fits in many instances.
Passing wins by allowing partner to offer a point of view, but loses whenever LHO has something to say, substance or not.
I'll double. For me it's not close.
1) LHO might go overboard in raising ♣s
2) Partner might have a 5-card major
3) Partner has a 4-card major and the Moysian works
4) Partner has 4♦ (it can happen!)
5) Partner has a ♣ stack (yes, even under the ♣ bidder).
4♦ wins whenever partner can raise, or when 4 is the limit for our side. It loses whenever partner fails to bid a major or holds clubs. While we do have a 7-card suit, we won't find playable 4-3 fits in many instances.
Passing wins by allowing partner to offer a point of view, but loses whenever LHO has something to say, substance or not.
I'll double. For me it's not close.
Be the partner you want to play with.
Trust demands integrity, balance and collaboration.
District 11
Unit 124
Steve Moese
Trust demands integrity, balance and collaboration.
District 11
Unit 124
Steve Moese
#8
Posted 2013-February-26, 01:46
I would double, but just because I do not like to commit to 5 ♦ right now and because 4 ♦ would be non leaping michaels.
If 4 ♦ is natural, I would choose it without a long hesitation.
If 4 ♦ is natural, I would choose it without a long hesitation.
Kind Regards
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#10
Posted 2013-February-26, 07:07
I will take the comfort of the over call thanks. When you get tapped on the get go it is nice to be able to get in later and take a few tricks after we have removed trumps. Over calling does not prevent partner from bidding a major to advance. On hands where partner is not able to bid after I step in, are the ones where this 7 bagger had better be trumps. If we double we will never be finding partner responding in diamonds with any 4D and a 4 major. Double also faces the risk of partner passing when I have not exactly the ideal hand for defense. Assume we double and catch partner with with a poor hand. He is bidding his J4th of H and not his Kxx in D. It is not impossible to find partner 4-4-3-2. If partner has some values and a 5 card major he can bid it over 4D.
#11
Posted 2013-February-26, 07:15
Here is the hand:
This was not a success.
Is partner's 6♦ call unreasonable?
This was not a success.
Is partner's 6♦ call unreasonable?
#12
Posted 2013-February-26, 07:45
Had the bidding gone any different opposite AQ6,KQ6,KT98642,-?
I like his gamble. You are a little shy in High cards for 4 diamonds, but you have to bid, he has too much for a lame 5 ♦ bid- bad luck.
I like his gamble. You are a little shy in High cards for 4 diamonds, but you have to bid, he has too much for a lame 5 ♦ bid- bad luck.
Kind Regards
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Page 1 of 1