Overcall or T.O double ?
#1
Posted 2013-March-16, 13:11
partner pass and RHO open 1C (better minor)
Your hand:
♠AQ943
♥A963
♦Ak82
♣---
Do you double or bid 1 spade ?
#2
Posted 2013-March-16, 13:55
Rik
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
#3
Posted 2013-March-16, 15:05
The bidding gets more involved later.
#5
Posted 2013-March-16, 17:54
#6
Posted 2013-March-17, 01:00
Cyberyeti, on 2013-March-16, 17:54, said:
Sure. But to that I would add that I would still double if you would replace the ♠A and ♦K with small cards in those suits.
The question is not whether you are strong enough for a "strong double". That is a matter of style and this strength is on the border. The first question is what you would do with this shape.
I would double because I have takeout shape. Other people might overcall 1♠ with this shape, but for half of those the hand is strong enough to double and bid spades. That leaves few people who would overcall with this strength and shape. And even if my partner would be one of those people he will not be horribly surprised to see that I doubled.
Rik
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
#7
Posted 2013-March-17, 01:19
I overcalled, with the idea that I am worth 2 bids, and would prefer to bid 1S and then a double, than first double and then either a second double or 2S.
for example: I preferred 1C-1S-2C/3C-P-P-D then 1C-D-2C/3C-P-P. I thought this is was suggested by both partnership bidding at bridge and mike Lawrence complete book of t.o double, but they didn't actually talked about this specific shape, but more of 5431 (which they suggested to overcall rather than double)
thank everyone
#8
Posted 2013-March-17, 04:44
#9
Posted 2013-March-18, 00:41
I like that here.
#10
Posted 2013-March-18, 04:32
#11
Posted 2013-March-18, 12:19
Trinidad, on 2013-March-17, 01:00, said:
The question is not whether you are strong enough for a "strong double". That is a matter of style and this strength is on the border. The first question is what you would do with this shape.
I would double because I have takeout shape. Other people might overcall 1♠ with this shape, but for half of those the hand is strong enough to double and bid spades. That leaves few people who would overcall with this strength and shape. And even if my partner would be one of those people he will not be horribly surprised to see that I doubled.
Rik
With this shape, I will overcall if strong enough to act again, and double if not. Why ?
Well I prefer 1♣-1♠-3♣-P-P-X to 1♣-X-3♣-P-P- (X or 3♠)
If I'm not good enough to bid again, I'll put 12 cards in play rather than 5.
There is not a big danger of playing 1♠ when we should be in game although it's possible if partner has a lot of hearts and few points, we respond to the (very sound) overcall as if we'd opened 1♠.
#12
Posted 2013-March-23, 01:33
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#13
Posted 2013-March-23, 07:45
*** Got me too. Must have been a devalued KING to king.