aguahombre, on 2013-May-28, 09:36, said:
100 percent for double ...(but).. afraid we might sell out to 3S over our 3H for no difference.
Codo, on 2013-May-28, 15:51, said:
If it is a partscore battle, you may be outgunned by the spades anyway...
ggwhiz, on 2013-May-28, 20:14, said:
I'm not seeing you bidding game on this one without scaring your pard out of making competitive bids in the future.
655321, on 2013-May-28, 20:57, said:
Agree with those who say that 2♦ is wrong rather than being a matter of style...(But)....
Having said all this, I can't say I would get to 4♥ either, particularly if they raise to 3♠ immediately.
Having said all this, I can't say I would get to 4♥ either, particularly if they raise to 3♠ immediately.
So, actually, we had a constructive debate about the virtues of an original double versus 2D overcall in a thread where we were asked to assess blame; and, it seems that we didn't accomplish an assessment of blame for defending 3S after all.
However, it is possible that the double might have created a fortunate variance and a better result.
Remembering the opponents do have ten trumps between them:
(1S) X (3S) ? ---if 4th chair gets froggy and takes a shot at 4H (thinking we have 9 hearts), we could get lucky playing it there or pushing them to one more, down 2. This would not happen after the 2D overcall.

Help
