TylerE, on 2013-August-13, 10:56, said:
I actually think that's correct, if slightly obscure usage.... consider how often the double (or the 1NT bid playing something like OS) is described as "for takeout", which would make advancer's bid the actual takeout.
This is a great start in sorting out what is what. That word "for" goes a long way in clearing up the answer for the opponents. It isn't the only way, however. At the table, I always believe that an opponent who asks about the nature of any call deserves something more than "takeout".