BBO Discussion Forums: Making Transfer Walsh ACBL GCC Compatible - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Making Transfer Walsh ACBL GCC Compatible

#21 User is offline   blackshoe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,695
  • Joined: 2006-April-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 2014-March-20, 10:22

 mycroft, on 2014-March-19, 14:08, said:

The issue is that the GCC has two definitions of strong (at least).

One specifically says that conventions are allowed after "strong (at least 15HCP) ..." openings. Another says that 2♣ or 2♦ can be used for "a strong hand". When it states a HCP range, you follow that; when it states a style, then you argue what that style is.

I do so love the GCC.

Yeah. The official ACBL position on "strong" artificial 2m is that '"strong" means whatever the player making the bid thinks it means'. Or so I was told (by Rick Beye, iirc). :rolleyes:
--------------------
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
0
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

3 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users