Posted 2016-October-19, 05:38
helene_t, on 2016-October-16, 05:18, said:
Result stands. I don't believe that the misexplanation makes double more attractive.
This is exactly how I thought what the law cares.
Apparently I was wrong.
According to people who dealt with so many appeal cases like this on screens, the law says E had the right to receive correct explanation of opponent system.
According to them it does not matter that South hand coincidentally matches to the explanation.
They say "Yes, East made a speculative double that we may not make, and the south hand was not something he did not expect, but this is irrelevant because if he received correct information he would not make this double"
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."