BBO Discussion Forums: GIB Defense - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

GIB Defense Need improvement

#1 User is offline   A2003 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 312
  • Joined: 2005-December-16

Posted 2017-October-07, 15:29

GIB Defense
0

#2 User is offline   broze 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,006
  • Joined: 2011-March-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK

Posted 2017-October-08, 14:46

Good thing it gave an encouraging signal though.
'In an infinite universe, the one thing sentient life cannot afford to have is a sense of proportion.' - Douglas Adams
0

#3 User is offline   johnu 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,030
  • Joined: 2008-September-10
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2017-October-08, 16:19

View Postbroze, on 2017-October-08, 14:46, said:

Good thing it gave an encouraging signal though.


Is the GIB system supposed to be encouragement or count? I thought the signal was supposed to be count in which case GIB gave the wrong count.

Maybe GIB didn't bother playing high because the description of the last double showed rebiddable ♦, ♦KQ. If GIB believes the description and not the actual cards held, covering when holding KQ would make no difference.
0

#4 User is online   smerriman 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,025
  • Joined: 2014-March-15
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2017-October-08, 16:31

View Postjohnu, on 2017-October-08, 16:19, said:

Is the GIB system supposed to be encouragement or count? I thought the signal was supposed to be count in which case GIB gave the wrong count.

Maybe GIB didn't bother playing high because the description of the last double showed rebiddable ♦, ♦KQ. If GIB believes the description and not the actual cards held, covering when holding KQ would make no difference.

I know your posts aren't normally intended to be serious, but if you / anyone else wasn't aware, "KQ" means at least 6 points on the 8-4-2-1 scale. So it shows either the A, or K + Q.
A better handviewer
Reverse engineering GIB, part 1: A treatise on the insanity of bidding simulations
0

#5 User is offline   broze 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,006
  • Joined: 2011-March-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK

Posted 2017-October-09, 02:17

View Postsmerriman, on 2017-October-08, 16:31, said:

"KQ" means at least 6 points on the 8-4-2-1 scale. So it shows either the A, or K + Q.


I knew this but I think it is very unfair on those who don't. Why don't the explanations simply reflect what is actually shown by the bid?
'In an infinite universe, the one thing sentient life cannot afford to have is a sense of proportion.' - Douglas Adams
0

#6 User is offline   LBengtsson 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 974
  • Joined: 2017-August-10
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2017-October-09, 09:09

gib defense play bidding needs improvement. i not play with robots until its right
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users