BBO Discussion Forums: Simple ATB - how to handle this preempt - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Simple ATB - how to handle this preempt

#21 User is offline   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,208
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2018-May-17, 05:36

View PostdsLawsd, on 2018-May-17, 03:08, said:

Both should bid 4S. Otherwise a negative double with such poor suits seems wrong at the 4 level.



I'd love to see the post mortem when S bid 4 and N had KQxxx, AKxxx, x, xx, 4 went off, 4 was cold when preempter had x, x, Jxx, AKxxxxxx
0

#22 User is offline   Tramticket 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,103
  • Joined: 2009-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Kent (Near London)

Posted 2018-May-17, 06:11

View PostCyberyeti, on 2018-May-17, 05:36, said:

I'd love to see the post mortem when S bid 4 and N had KQxxx, AKxxx, x, xx, 4 went off, 4 was cold when preempter had x, x, Jxx, AKxxxxxx


Too many K's - but I agree with the point.
0

#23 User is offline   gszes 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,660
  • Joined: 2011-February-12

Posted 2018-May-17, 07:26

View Postmsjennifer, on 2018-May-17, 01:14, said:

Almost all players play negative double up to 3S only unless previously discussed.Personally I would bid 4S ,which many will consider absurd, with the South hand.Unless previously discussed 4Cx Is a penalty double.


I have to admit that I have seen no player that uses neg x BELOW (a max of) 4h in a longgggg time. The rationale for using neg x through 7h is quite strong (though so rare it does bring utility into question vs other far more common uses).

Having to bid 4s with this hand should give you good reason to pause and reconsider how high you want to play neg x:)
0

#24 User is offline   gszes 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,660
  • Joined: 2011-February-12

Posted 2018-May-17, 07:26

View Postgszes, on 2018-May-17, 07:26, said:

I have to admit that I have seen no player that uses neg x BELOW (a max of) 4h in a longgggg time. The rationale for using neg x through 7h is quite strong (though so rare it does bring utility into question vs other far more common uses).

Having to bid 4s (as responder) with this hand should give you good reason to pause and reconsider how high you want to play neg x:)

0

#25 User is offline   FelicityR 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 980
  • Joined: 2012-October-26
  • Gender:Female

Posted 2018-May-17, 08:53

I think that if you make a negative double at the four level in this type of auction you should have a tiny bit of tolerance for partner's opening suit, especially a major, so North should press on to 4 with the extra sixth . However, I do accept that if you have a 0553 hand you really do not have any other bid than double too.
0

#26 User is offline   RD350LC 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 154
  • Joined: 2016-April-22

Posted 2018-May-17, 10:52

View Postel mister, on 2018-May-16, 05:35, said:



Club game matchpoints. 4X - 1 did not make us rich, in fact it was a cold bottom. Reasonable calls, or is there clear culpability for not bidding 4S (either N or S)?

As a lot of other people have indicated, south had a reasonable negative double, and north should have bid 4 . I tend to be rather aggressive in making pre-empts, and usually they work out.
There is no perfect solution, and that is why I am aggressive in pre-empting.
0

#27 User is offline   MrAce 

  • VIP Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,971
  • Joined: 2009-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, TX

Posted 2018-May-17, 11:14

View Postel mister, on 2018-May-16, 05:35, said:



Club game matchpoints. 4X - 1 did not make us rich, in fact it was a cold bottom. Reasonable calls, or is there clear culpability for not bidding 4S (either N or S)?


I think the auction you showed in diagram is VERY reasonable.
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"

"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."





0

#28 User is offline   cleveritis 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 35
  • Joined: 2017-December-15

Posted 2018-May-17, 11:54

play all doubles as take out... at least through 4S, the higher the bid, the more they get left in, he has an easy 4s bid
0

#29 User is offline   Caitlynne 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 238
  • Joined: 2015-October-09

Posted 2018-May-17, 17:10

I think South's takeout Dbl is quite reasonable and is better than the other alternatives (4D, 4H, and 4S). But with Ax of clubs, North should know that 4C is not off much and that partner is quite unlikely to be short in spades. I would rebid 4S with the North hand. Remember, takeout Doubles should generally be taken out whenever you have any reasonable action to remove it. Rebidding a good 6 card spade suit is a VERY reasonable action to take out the Double. North gets 100% of the blame for this one.
0

#30 User is offline   msjennifer 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,366
  • Joined: 2013-August-03
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Variable private
  • Interests:Cricket,Photography,Paediatrics and Community Medicine.

Posted 2018-May-17, 23:22

View PostCyberyeti, on 2018-May-17, 02:59, said:

You seem to have no comprehension of what goes on outside your immediate circle, negative to 7 is not uncommon, negative to at least 4 is normal here.

Sir,kindly read my statement in full context.I have written that ,” Unless previously discussed” 4Cx is a penalty double as one has already specified in his convention card that mention “upto 3S” under the column “negative doubles”.I know that Larry Cohen has advised negative doubles “ upto infinity”.I was referring to “ non expert “ players who will certainly be flabbergasted to know “upto infinity”.One gets a different partner every two deals and it is in their profiles negative double is played upto 2/3 Spade only and it is not at all wrong to conclude that 4Cx is a penalty double.Whenever not able to do that they simply PASS hoping that partner may make a TOD.It is for these reasons that I have said I shall bid 4S with the South hand.And believe me ,I never consider myself as an EXPERT.Compared to Benito and Hamman I may fall only in the intermediates class only.I sincerely hope that you will appreciate my comments in light of this.



0

#31 User is offline   msjennifer 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,366
  • Joined: 2013-August-03
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Variable private
  • Interests:Cricket,Photography,Paediatrics and Community Medicine.

Posted 2018-May-17, 23:59

In the SAYC system which is used by most on BBO,it is clearly written under negative doubles,1It is used upto a level of 2repeat 2spades.2) It CAN be played at higher levels also.3)The higher level upto which it is played is decided by previous agreement.4)All the comments which I express or the opinions I give are normally adhering to the SAYC System.
0

#32 User is offline   ahydra 

  • AQT92 AQ --- QJ6532
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,840
  • Joined: 2009-September-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellington, NZ

Posted 2018-May-18, 00:26

It's useful to make a distinction between negative doubles and, erm, negative doubles. It's very common to play takeout up to 4H/whatever, but only promise the other major to 2S, which might be where the SAYC definition comes from.

ahydra
0

#33 User is offline   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,208
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2018-May-18, 02:18

View Postmsjennifer, on 2018-May-17, 23:22, said:

Sir,kindly read my statement in full context.I have written that ,” Unless previously discussed” 4Cx is a penalty double as one has already specified in his convention card that mention “upto 3S” under the column “negative doubles”.I know that Larry Cohen has advised negative doubles “ upto infinity”.I was referring to “ non expert “ players who will certainly be flabbergasted to know “upto infinity”.One gets a different partner every two deals and it is in their profiles negative double is played upto 2/3 Spade only and it is not at all wrong to conclude that 4Cx is a penalty double.Whenever not able to do that they simply PASS hoping that partner may make a TOD.It is for these reasons that I have said I shall bid 4S with the South hand.And believe me ,I never consider myself as an EXPERT.Compared to Benito and Hamman I may fall only in the intermediates class only.I sincerely hope that you will appreciate my comments in light of this.


Unless previously discussed where you are maybe it's to 3, here I would guess it's 4 and not be surprised if I played with somebody who thought 1-5-X was takeout undiscussed
0

#34 User is offline   pes_6 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 31
  • Joined: 2011-March-02

Posted 2018-May-18, 09:29

S 4 instead x because have two s and escape suit s if partner need it, after it N bid 4.
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

3 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users