BBO Discussion Forums: Awkward response to negative double - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Awkward response to negative double

Poll: Awkward response to negative double (8 member(s) have cast votes)

My response to dbl:

  1. Pass, partner should try not to double with club shortage (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  2. Pass but it's risky as p could have club shortage (1 votes [12.50%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 12.50%

  3. 2d, partner shouldn't pass with only two diamonds (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  4. 2d but partner may pass with 2 (or fewer?) diamonds (4 votes [50.00%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 50.00%

  5. 2h, this only shows 3 (1 votes [12.50%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 12.50%

  6. 2h but partner will assume 4 (2 votes [25.00%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 25.00%

  7. 2NT, partner won't assume I have a club stopper (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  8. 2NT but partner will assume I have a club stopper (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  9. Other (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,087
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:UK

Posted 2022-April-01, 04:07

1♦-(2♣)-x-(pass)
?

KQx-KJx-KJxx-xxx

Playing 5-card majors, strong notrump. Assume forcing freebids if it matters.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
2

#2 User is offline   LBengtsson 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 974
  • Joined: 2017-August-10
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2022-April-01, 05:44

If you play strong NT with 5M and this bidding sequence, partner should realise that you might have this 3343 (weak NT) hand. That's why players prefer a 1♣ opening here. 2♦ is a false bid, promising 5+ ♦. 2♥ is better response to the neg X imo as you've been forced to bid, and partner should not expect 4♥ here. (Though one for partnership discussion and agreement.)

Btw The negative X bidder does not promise 4M in either ♥/♠ but a hand with values to bid, but with no obvious bid.
0

#3 User is offline   DavidKok 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,256
  • Joined: 2020-March-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Netherlands

Posted 2022-April-01, 09:57

Another day another problem over either 1♦-(P)-2♣ or 1♦-(2♣). I would introduce artificial responses over both.
1

#4 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,087
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:UK

Posted 2022-April-01, 14:30

View PostDavidKok, on 2022-April-01, 09:57, said:

Another day another problem over either 1♦-(P)-2♣ or 1♦-(2♣). I would introduce artificial responses over both.

Yup. For example, Han Peters suggested that dbl shows 4+ spades (with hearts and diamond tolerance but less than 4 spades he bids 2♦) and then you don't have this problem.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#5 User is offline   nige1 

  • 5-level belongs to me
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,128
  • Joined: 2004-August-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Glasgow Scotland
  • Interests:Poems Computers

Posted 2022-April-06, 14:27


Helene_T 'Playing 5-card majors, strong notrump. Assume forcing freebids if it matters.

IMO, here 2♦ = ART Catchall. Might be 2 or 3 cards. Denies 4 card M.
To avoid devising a weirder structure :(

Guthrie.tech
1
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users