How would the auction go at your table?
Game - both ways?
#1
Posted 2025-November-06, 11:45
How would the auction go at your table?
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
If you are my partner, please never tell me "I play the rule of (insert #)"
#2
Posted 2025-November-06, 14:22
If not, it would either start 1D or finish with an argument.
#3
Posted 2025-November-06, 14:51
Maybe
1D P 1H P
3D X XX 3S
4D 4S P P
5D 5S P P
P
I wouldn't hang my partner whatever happened, on either side.
#8
Posted 2025-November-06, 17:00
2N some preempt
(X) takeout guessing the preempt is ♥
P
(4♥) guessing the preempt is ♦
P
(P) confused
P
But the ♦ hand looks too strong for a preempt so playing my Esoteric unbalanced ♦
1♦ - (P) - 1♠ GI - ?
4♥ even KCs - (P) - 5♦ - (P)
or
1♦ - 1♠ GI
2♦ - 2N
3N
#9
Posted 2025-November-06, 17:18
If so then 4c or 4D can now be some type of asking bids by partner over the 3NT.
4c may ask for shortness..
#10
Posted Yesterday, 01:36
If East opens a gambling 3NT I don't think I would find it in me to pass as North in fourth seat.
#11
Posted Yesterday, 03:37
Given the colors, I dont mind 5D, which will also end the auction.
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#14
Posted Yesterday, 10:41
From the common game yesterday. Yeah, I realize it's not "game both ways"...
#15
Posted Yesterday, 10:42
mike777, on 2025-November-06, 17:18, said:
If so then 4c or 4D can now be some type of asking bids by partner over the 3NT.
4c may ask for shortness..
I have not seen this but I'm not playing tournament bridge so wouldn't know. I would not be surprised to see Gambling 3nt losing popularity,
I like Fred's treatment but still waiting to add it to the CC
the hand
fred, on 2025-June-22, 15:28, said:
I invented (or, more likely, unknowingly reinvented) this convention about 25 years ago.
Doesn't come up very often of course, but it seemed to work better than any of the alternatives for 3NT openings that I have tried over the years. Admittedly it is hard to be objective about such things and I certainly have not made any real effort to keep track of the results.
You need to play reasonable methods over this for it to be workable. If anyone is interested, I will post what we came up with. I might not be able to do so immediately as I am in the middle of playing in a serious tournament.
It is a fun convention to play which, for me at least, is a nice plus
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
If you are my partner, please never tell me "I play the rule of (insert #)"
#16
Posted Yesterday, 10:44
#17
Posted Yesterday, 17:35
mycroft, on 2025-November-07, 10:41, said:
From the common game yesterday. Yeah, I realize it's not "game both ways"...
Beautiful, if you are sitting NS
mike777, on 2025-November-07, 10:44, said:
Good luck in the VB
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
If you are my partner, please never tell me "I play the rule of (insert #)"

Help
