BBO Discussion Forums: Another reason why 2C is never natural :) - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Another reason why 2C is never natural :)

#1 User is offline   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,448
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted Today, 10:14

I am listening to Adam Parish's Leveling Up Podcast with Danny Miles.
Danny describes his treatment with Jason Feldman, the dutch 2♣ where after (1♦) 1♥ (pass) we don't know if partner has 7 or 17

They use 2♣* as the limit raise giving partner the room to describe the overcall.
2M minimum
2♦ 12-13

Simple, and easy to remember when 2♣ is never natural.
“It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.”
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
1 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

  1. Huibertus