BBO Discussion Forums: Big 6-5 - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Big 6-5

Poll: Your call? (41 member(s) have cast votes)

Your call?

  1. 2C (5 votes [12.20%])

    Percentage of vote: 12.20%

  2. 3C (19 votes [46.34%])

    Percentage of vote: 46.34%

  3. 4C (Undiscussed) (1 votes [2.44%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.44%

  4. 4H (10 votes [24.39%])

    Percentage of vote: 24.39%

  5. Other (3 votes [7.32%])

    Percentage of vote: 7.32%

  6. 2H (1 votes [2.44%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.44%

  7. 3H (added out of order to prevent changing results) (2 votes [4.88%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.88%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#41 User is offline   Al_U_Card 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,080
  • Joined: 2005-May-16
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2005-September-13, 08:38

The initial explanation was 1NT denying 4 good spades (if he has 4). AT9x seems to be pretty good to me, considering the possibility of S in the doublers hand.......

With the hand described, AT9x, x, QJTx, 9xxx and a rebid of, say, C or H, how should this hand continue? (I gather that the doubler remained quiet?)
The Grand Design, reflected in the face of Chaos...it's a fluke!
0

#42 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2005-September-13, 08:50

I think AT9x is borderline to be a decent suit. But maybe I'm just carrying over keeping the partnership morale 4 days later LOL. Many of you are correct - there isn't a whole lot of downside to showing spades here.

Oddly enough, a redouble shuts up my LHO and I can play 4, which will be a gain. The bozos at the other table played a partscore, since the two hands 'only' have 13 opposite 7. :)
"Phil" on BBO
0

#43 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2005-September-13, 09:07

lol...13 HCP...nice.
0

#44 User is offline   ABadPlayer 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 33
  • Joined: 2005-April-08

Posted 2005-September-13, 15:54

I agree with Justin and Hannie that a 4H bid is practical and unrevealing. I wouldn't object to strongly to a 3C bid, but I don't see a lot of benefit to it either.
0

#45 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2005-September-15, 14:58

4 is too unrevealing, opponents are having fit and strenght, you won't play 4, and partner is gonna have to make a decision at the 5 or 6 level.
0

  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users