BBO Discussion Forums: second card from KQJX - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

second card from KQJX

#1 User is offline   Flame 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,085
  • Joined: 2004-March-26
  • Location:Israel

Posted 2005-November-02, 18:10

Holding KQJX(X) You lead K .
Later in the game u get to lead again.
Kanter say the lead of the J ask partner to drop the 10, meaning yo normaly would continue with the Q.
When i learned the basics we always continue with the J and Q denied the J.
Ofcourse you can say it depend on the exact situation...
But what is the normal play ?
0

#2 User is offline   luke warm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,951
  • Joined: 2003-September-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Bridge, poker, politics

Posted 2005-November-02, 18:27

i always thought the lead of the Q here denies the J, so from what i've been taught that would be 'normal'
"Paul Krugman is a stupid person's idea of what a smart person sounds like." Newt Gingrich (paraphrased)
0

#3 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2005-November-02, 18:41

I lead K then J (if not leading low the second time) from KQJx(xxx), K then Q from KQx or KQJ tight.
0

#4 User is offline   barmar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 22,036
  • Joined: 2004-August-21
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2005-November-03, 09:41

In general, when you have a semi-solid sequence and you want partner to drop the missing honor, I think you're supposed to lead the card above it the first time. So with KQJ98 you would play the J first. When partner holds the 10, he knows this isn't the top of a sequence, and usually he should be able to tell from his hand and the auction whether it's from a sequence like this or from shortness (if he can't tell, it probably doesn't matter whether he holds on to his 10).

Thus, if you play K first and later play the J, it denies the 98, and partner should hold on to his 10.

#5 User is offline   paulg 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,207
  • Joined: 2003-April-26
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Edinburgh

Posted 2005-November-03, 10:56

Jlall, on Nov 3 2005, 12:41 AM, said:

I lead K then J (if not leading low the second time) from KQJx(xxx), K then Q from KQx or KQJ tight.

I play the same. My guiding principle is that when I lead the Q I do not want partner to overtake or unblock.

Paul
The Beer Card

I don't work for BBO and any advice is based on my BBO experience over the decades
0

#6 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2005-November-03, 11:11

cardsharp, on Nov 3 2005, 11:56 AM, said:

Jlall, on Nov 3 2005, 12:41 AM, said:

I lead K then J (if not leading low the second time) from KQJx(xxx), K then Q from KQx or KQJ tight.

I play the same. My guiding principle is that when I lead the Q I do not want partner to overtake or unblock.

Paul

right...ditto.
0

#7 User is offline   Flame 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,085
  • Joined: 2004-March-26
  • Location:Israel

Posted 2005-November-03, 11:14

I play the same too, thats why i was surprise to see kanter suggest otherwise.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users