BBO Discussion Forums: pass, nothing, pass, pass, ? call TD - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

pass, nothing, pass, pass, ? call TD

#1 User is offline   Rev Dino 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 16
  • Joined: 2004-March-07
  • Location:Zagreb, Croatia
  • Interests:Ice hockey, motorbikes, beers.

Posted 2010-March-22, 07:58

As I said, weird auction happened at the table:

pass, nothing, pass, pass.

What now?

I have no idea what TD should decide here. Anyone?
The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the iniquities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he, who in the name of charity and good will, shepherds the weak through the valley of darkness, for he is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who would attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. And you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon thee.
0

#2 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2010-March-22, 08:05

you should post this in the Laws forum. very funny and interesting situation. from my passing acquaintance with the laws I think 4th seat accepted the pass out of turn?
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#3 User is offline   Rev Dino 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 16
  • Joined: 2004-March-07
  • Location:Zagreb, Croatia
  • Interests:Ice hockey, motorbikes, beers.

Posted 2010-March-22, 08:11

gwnn, on Mar 22 2010, 09:05 AM, said:

you should post this in the Laws forum. very funny and interesting situation. from my passing acquaintance with the laws I think 4th seat accepted the pass out of turn?

I am more interested in what players think about it then what book says.
The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the iniquities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he, who in the name of charity and good will, shepherds the weak through the valley of darkness, for he is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who would attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. And you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon thee.
0

#4 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2010-March-22, 08:33

If you don't mind me asking, why? The laws people will most likely know the correct answer. The player people will either know the correct answer or not. Are you trying to find out what % of players know the rules?
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#5 User is offline   TimG 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,972
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maine, USA

Posted 2010-March-22, 08:57

I believe all four players must pass for there to be a passout. (Three passes end the auction only following a bid, so even if dealer passes -- so that the auction is P-nothing-P-P-P -- the auction would not end.)

If the director is called after the third pass -- P-nothing-P-P -- I do not know whether dealer is given the option of making a call or whether the auction is immediately rolled back to second hand. Either way, the auction does not end without second hand being given a chance to call.

As a player, I think second hand should be given a chance to act. It doesn't seem desirable to enforce a passout and a likely unusual result when it is a relatively simple matter to correct the irregularity and get a normal result.
0

#6 User is offline   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,649
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted 2010-March-22, 08:59

Rev Dino, on Mar 22 2010, 07:11 AM, said:

gwnn, on Mar 22 2010, 09:05 AM, said:

you should post this in the Laws forum. very funny and interesting situation. from my passing acquaintance with the laws I think 4th seat accepted the pass out of turn?

I am more interested in what players think about it then what book says.

This sounds like one of those dreadful table rulings, I call the TD
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." MikeH
“Let me put it in words you might understand,” he said. “Mr. Trump, f–k off!” Anders Vistisen
0

#7 User is offline   jjbrr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,525
  • Joined: 2009-March-30
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-March-22, 09:08

I'd call the TD. I also have no idea what the TD should decide.

Alternatively, second seat should have bid and/or paid attention.
OK
bed
0

#8 User is offline   Bbradley62 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,542
  • Joined: 2010-February-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY, USA

Posted 2010-March-22, 09:20

jjbrr, on Mar 22 2010, 10:08 AM, said:

I'd call the TD. I also have no idea what the TD should decide.

Alternatively, second seat should have bid and/or paid attention.

It's third and fourth seats, not second, who should be told to pay attention.
0

#9 User is offline   jjbrr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,525
  • Joined: 2009-March-30
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-March-22, 09:23

Bbradley62, on Mar 22 2010, 10:20 AM, said:

jjbrr, on Mar 22 2010, 10:08 AM, said:

I'd call the TD. I also have no idea what the TD should decide.

Alternatively, second seat should have bid and/or paid attention.

It's third and fourth seats, not second, who should be told to pay attention.

lol... ok.
OK
bed
0

#10 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2010-March-22, 09:57

well I know what a director said on this situation:

1NT - nothing -pass -pass

called and decided that secodn pass accepted first one, so it was now 1NT bidder's turn

he passed, but the player who had no bid said that the auction couldn't finnish without her making a bid.

I think there is something in the rules that say that this is true, an auciton cannot finnish with a player having not maken any bid.

Director should had ruled that if the second hand player wasn't happy with the 1NT contract, the 3 passes are moved back, and it is again its turn.

However Director in this case ruled that the offending side could not end the auction, and the 1NT opener couldn't pass and was forbidden to take that call LOL. 1NT opener bid 2 and they found their 4-4 heart fit making comfortably 140.
0

#11 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2010-March-22, 09:58

The third pass condoned the second. The auction continues, with dealer next to call.

Law 22 said:

The auction ends when:
1. all four players pass (but see Law 25).

If dealer passes, only three of the players have passed, so second-hand will still have a chance to bid.

The case cited by Fluffy is different:

Law 17 said:

2. When a call has been followed by three passes the auction does not end
if one of those passes was out of rotation, depriving a player of his right
to call at that turn. When this occurs the auction reverts to the player
who missed his turn, all subsequent passes are cancelled and the auction
proceeds normally. Law 16D applies to the cancelled calls, any player who
has passed out of rotation being an offender.

... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#12 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2010-March-23, 01:17

Andy, you are boring. :rolleyes: Stating some facts again, so that nobody can pronounce his opinion any more...

I had not known this details at the table and simply called the TD.
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users