JavaBean, on Aug 23 2010, 01:45 PM, said:
Why is 1NT by West (or North or whoever the opponents were) scoring so badly? They are vulnerable and, at least at our table, North will be leading a club (as the 1D opening doesn't show much in diamonds). That gets us 100 for sure, and with West having very few dummy entries, if any, we seem certain to find another trick somewhere for +200. Even if North leads a diamond 50% of the time, that's still ~33% chance at +200, which should come out well above 2 MPs.
I think you're overestimating your tricks.
You have four clubs and two aces. There is no significant chance for another trick in any suit except spades. So assuming best defense, you are defending 1NT= any time declarer (the much stronger of the opponent hands) has
♠AQ, and you are otherwise defending 1NT-1. On a red suit lead of course, you could easily be defending 1NT+1.
Unless you doubled 1NT, +200 is not really in the picture.
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
If south (east) opens 1NT, West (north) doubles (natural, 15+ any dist), EW (NS) out of the auction after that. If South opens one of a suit, West overcalls 1NT
This one was added at the last minute in response to an article in ACBL bullentin about running out of 1NT-x. I didn't expect people to have problems with it, and in fact, the field handled this one quite nicely as a whole. In addition, it is not clear that with 4 hcp you need to run out of 1NTx.