BBO Discussion Forums: Round 2, Board 14 - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Round 2, Board 14

#1 User is offline   inquiry 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 14,566
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amelia Island, FL
  • Interests:Bridge, what else?

Posted 2010-August-23, 11:54

Scoring: IMP


East deals and opens 2♥ (weak). West raises to 3♥ if possible after which EW out of auction


6NS=12, 6D-11, 6S=7, 3NS=7, 4S=4, 5D=2, 3Hx=0

6DN ant590 - crayzeejim
6DS jlall/hanp
3NS bluecalm/redds
3NS hrothgar/Free
6SN jdonn/gib
3NS olegru - driver733
3SN tlgoodwin/timg
3NS tylere / bid_em_up
4SN East4Evil/sohcahtoa
4SN elianna/awm
4SN Flycycle/Wackojack
4SN gnasher/catch22
4SN karlson/threenobob
4SN lobowolf/bkjswan
4SN mbodell - javabean
4SN rogerClee/cherdano
4SN sallyally/joylson
4SN Siegmund/MSchmahl
5DN kristen33/jillybean
5DN peachy/lg62
3HEx kfay/jchiu
--Ben--

#2 User is offline   bluecalm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,555
  • Joined: 2007-January-22

Posted 2010-August-23, 11:56

Someone teach me how to bid this one please !
0

#3 User is offline   JLOGIC 

  • 2011 Poster of The Year winner
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,002
  • Joined: 2010-July-08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-August-23, 12:13

We got to 6D after (2H)-2N-(3H)-X-(p)-4D
blogging at http://www.justinlall.com
0

#4 User is offline   Siegmund 

  • Alchemist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,764
  • Joined: 2004-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Beside a little lake in northwestern Montana
  • Interests:Creator of the 'grbbridge' LaTeX typesetting package.

Posted 2010-August-24, 01:58

I am surprised to see 6S being punished so severely in the scoring. 6D is only outscoring it when spades are 5-1 and the CK is onside, it looks like to me (and losing to it every time 6S makes = anytime spades break)... I would expect 6S to be scored ahead of 6D at MPs.
0

#5 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2010-August-24, 03:44

also when LHO has ♥A; 4 spades and ♣K
BridgeGod: my personal website with interactive problems and articles
0

#6 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2010-August-24, 06:09

JLOGIC, on Aug 23 2010, 07:13 PM, said:

We got to 6D after (2H)-2N-(3H)-X-(p)-4D

Would 3♠ have been forcing? If so, it seems odd to double, which risks losing the 5-3 fit.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#7 User is offline   bluecalm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,555
  • Joined: 2007-January-22

Posted 2010-August-24, 09:19

Quote

We got to 6D after (2H)-2N-(3H)-X-(p)-4D


We bid:

2♥ - 2NT - 3♥ - 3♠
pass - 3NT passes

2NT might be underbid (some of my friends think so).
Why did you chose a double instead of 3♠ ?
0

#8 User is offline   Ant590 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 749
  • Joined: 2005-July-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Melbourne, Australia

Posted 2010-August-24, 09:41

I overbid (again), and cuebid 4♥ on the sequence

(2♥) - dbl - (3♥) - 4♥

Partner made me pick a minor with 4NT then raised to 6.
0

#9 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2010-August-24, 17:11

Shouldn't 6♠ clearly be ahead of 6♦? By comparison 6♦ wins any time spades are 5-1. 6♠ wins any time spades are 3-3 or 4-2 and the club is on. That seems a lot more likely to me.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#10 User is offline   JLOGIC 

  • 2011 Poster of The Year winner
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,002
  • Joined: 2010-July-08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-August-24, 17:31

jdonn, on Aug 24 2010, 06:11 PM, said:

Shouldn't 6♠ clearly be ahead of 6♦? By comparison 6♦ wins any time spades are 5-1. 6♠ wins any time spades are 3-3 or 4-2 and the club is on. That seems a lot more likely to me.

If almost everyone is in 4S, then 6D is definitely better than 6S.
blogging at http://www.justinlall.com
0

#11 User is offline   cherdanno 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,640
  • Joined: 2009-February-16

Posted 2010-August-24, 18:24

JLOGIC, on Aug 24 2010, 06:31 PM, said:

jdonn, on Aug 24 2010, 06:11 PM, said:

Shouldn't 6♠ clearly be ahead of 6♦? By comparison 6♦ wins any time spades are 5-1. 6♠ wins any time spades are 3-3 or 4-2 and the club is on. That seems a lot more likely to me.

If almost everyone is in 4S, then 6D is definitely better than 6S.

But still a 7 for 6S is really low. I would think it makes 75%+% of the time: they only bid to 3H on a 10-card fit, so a good spade break is even more likely than the 85% rpbridge.net calculates under the assumption of hearts being 6-4; and if they have a diamond ruff they still have to find it.
"Are you saying that LTC merits a more respectful dismissal?"
0

#12 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2010-August-24, 18:56

It's true 6♦ is better if people aren't in slam, but as next mentioned it's also true that 6♠ is worth more than a 7 in any case. I mean it's still better than 3NT as long as it makes more often than not which I'm very convinced it does.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#13 User is offline   JLOGIC 

  • 2011 Poster of The Year winner
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,002
  • Joined: 2010-July-08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-August-24, 18:58

Yeah I agree with both of you
blogging at http://www.justinlall.com
0

#14 User is offline   TimG 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,972
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maine, USA

Posted 2010-August-24, 22:33

jdonn, on Aug 24 2010, 07:56 PM, said:

It's true 6♦ is better if people aren't in slam, but as next mentioned it's also true that 6♠ is worth more than a 7 in any case. I mean it's still better than 3NT as long as it makes more often than not which I'm very convinced it does.

Shouldn't partials be worth a little something if some slams are going down? <ducks>
0

#15 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2010-August-25, 14:49

TimG, on Aug 24 2010, 11:33 PM, said:

jdonn, on Aug 24 2010, 07:56 PM, said:

It's true 6♦ is better if people aren't in slam, but as next mentioned it's also true that 6♠ is worth more than a 7 in any case. I mean it's still better than 3NT as long as it makes more often than not which I'm very convinced it does.

Shouldn't partials be worth a little something if some slams are going down? <ducks>

Sure they should be worth more than 0.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users