BBO Discussion Forums: Explanation Interruptus - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 4 Pages +
  • « First
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Explanation Interruptus

#61 User is offline   mrdct 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,448
  • Joined: 2003-October-27
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Moama, NSW

Posted 2012-March-14, 05:42

 blackshoe, on 2012-March-12, 17:37, said:

So what should I say? I can't say "we're a new partnership", I can't say "I'm not sure", I can't say "look at the card", I can't say "I'm not sure, but..." (this one will get interrupted), I can't say "I have no clue " (which would be untrue). So what can I say?

Director please!
Disclaimer: The above post may be a half-baked sarcastic rant intended to stimulate discussion and it does not necessarily coincide with my own views on this topic.
I bidding the suit below the suit I'm actually showing not to be described as a "transfer" for the benefit of people unfamiliar with the concept of a transfer
0

#62 User is offline   iviehoff 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,165
  • Joined: 2009-July-15

Posted 2012-March-14, 09:06

 mrdct, on 2012-March-14, 05:42, said:

Director please!

Law 20F4 says that he "must" do that. My guess is that he is himself the Director.

On the question Blackshoe originally wanted to ask, rather than the numerous matters arising that arose from the context:

In general if a player tells me to stop giving him information part way through, thus failing to learn something substantive, I would tend to think "Thank you. That insulates me from any adverse MI ruling on this point."
0

#63 User is offline   blackshoe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,693
  • Joined: 2006-April-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 2012-March-14, 16:58

 iviehoff, on 2012-March-14, 09:06, said:

In general if a player tells me to stop giving him information part way through, thus failing to learn something substantive, I would tend to think "Thank you. That insulates me from any adverse MI ruling on this point."


Good point, Ivie. :)
--------------------
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
0

#64 User is offline   mrdct 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,448
  • Joined: 2003-October-27
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Moama, NSW

Posted 2012-March-15, 04:07

 iviehoff, on 2012-March-14, 09:06, said:

Law 20F4 says that he "must" do that. My guess is that he is himself the Director.

Since when does being a playing director preclude one (or even excuse one) from calling the director?
Disclaimer: The above post may be a half-baked sarcastic rant intended to stimulate discussion and it does not necessarily coincide with my own views on this topic.
I bidding the suit below the suit I'm actually showing not to be described as a "transfer" for the benefit of people unfamiliar with the concept of a transfer
0

#65 User is offline   blackshoe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,693
  • Joined: 2006-April-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 2012-March-15, 07:13

 iviehoff, on 2012-March-14, 09:06, said:

My guess is that he is himself the Director.


If by "he" you mean me, no, not this time. Had I been a playing Director, there was at least one other director playing there that day, and I would have called her.
--------------------
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
0

  • 4 Pages +
  • « First
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users