BBO Discussion Forums: MI - Was there damage? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

MI - Was there damage? EBU

#1 User is offline   Quartic 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 285
  • Joined: 2010-December-19
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Walking, Climbing, Mathematics, Programming, Linux, Reading, Bridge.

Posted 2012-March-13, 17:01



2♣ was announced as stayman, but the agreement was actually that 2♣ was a natural escape.

South made 11 tricks in 3♥. Were NS damaged by the MI?
0

#2 User is online   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,215
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2012-March-13, 17:08

What did S say he'd have done if 2♣ had been correctly described ?

My guess is that NS would have played in a heart part score pretty much however the auction had developed.
0

#3 User is offline   Quartic 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 285
  • Joined: 2010-December-19
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Walking, Climbing, Mathematics, Programming, Linux, Reading, Bridge.

Posted 2012-March-13, 17:13

View PostCyberyeti, on 2012-March-13, 17:08, said:

What did S say he'd have done if 2♣ had been correctly described ?

My guess is that NS would have played in a heart part score pretty much however the auction had developed.


South would have passed 2♣, to give partner the opportunity to double for penalties. North would have bid 2♦ had it been passed round to her. NS aren't sure how they would have bid from there.
0

#4 User is offline   mgoetze 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,942
  • Joined: 2005-January-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cologne, Germany
  • Interests:Sleeping, Eating

Posted 2012-March-13, 17:18

View PostQuartic, on 2012-March-13, 17:13, said:

North would have bid 2♦ had it been passed round to her.


However, this didn't happen because West forgot his system. What North would have done had West remembered the system is irrelevant.
"One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision"
    -- Bertrand Russell
0

#5 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2012-March-13, 19:05

We have a mistaken explanation of 2C, and West bid as if his explanation was correct. East made no attempt to use the UI from the mistaken explanation. The only person whose first-round action is strange is South.

No adjustment, no damage, no nothing. Let's ignore the defense allowing the heart partial to make five :rolleyes:
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#6 User is offline   iviehoff 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,165
  • Joined: 2009-July-15

Posted 2012-March-14, 02:49

View Postaguahombre, on 2012-March-13, 19:05, said:

Let's ignore the defense allowing the heart partial to make five :rolleyes:

It's harder to ignore the likelihood that NS will often make 10 tricks playing in hearts, indeed I can't see what the defence can do to stop it.

But I can't see NS bidding 4H even if S bids on the first round. N barely has what he has promised with his double, and isn't going to be accepting invitations or encouraging progress - and we have evidence from the auction to support that; S isn't going to bid 4H on his own - and we have evidence from the auction to support that.
0

#7 User is offline   mrdct 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,448
  • Joined: 2003-October-27
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Moama, NSW

Posted 2012-March-14, 02:51

View Postaguahombre, on 2012-March-13, 19:05, said:

Let's ignore the defense allowing the heart partial to make five :rolleyes:

I'm guessing there was a ♦ lead and continuation and the ♣ loser went on a long ♦. Not entirely unreasonable.

As for the ruling, table result stands. The MI didn't impact on any decision NS made and East didn't take advantage of the UI from the MI.
Disclaimer: The above post may be a half-baked sarcastic rant intended to stimulate discussion and it does not necessarily coincide with my own views on this topic.
I ♦ bidding the suit below the suit I'm actually showing not to be described as a "transfer" for the benefit of people unfamiliar with the concept of a transfer
0

#8 User is offline   mr1303 

  • Admirer of Walter the Walrus
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,563
  • Joined: 2003-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
  • Interests:Bridge, surfing, water skiing, cricket, golf. Generally being outside really.

Posted 2012-March-15, 06:42

As long as the queen of hearts wasn't covered :)
0

#9 User is offline   Quartic 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 285
  • Joined: 2010-December-19
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Walking, Climbing, Mathematics, Programming, Linux, Reading, Bridge.

Posted 2012-March-15, 08:47

View Postmr1303, on 2012-March-15, 06:42, said:

As long as the queen of hearts wasn't covered :)


This is how the contract made 11 tricks. :P
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

4 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users