BBO Discussion Forums: Lebensohl forgotten (EBU) - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Lebensohl forgotten (EBU)

#1 User is offline   VixTD 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,052
  • Joined: 2009-September-09

Posted 2012-March-20, 08:24


This occurred at the club last night. West and South are experienced regular county B-team players, East occasionally plays for the C-team, North is considerably less experienced. NS are a relatively new partnership, and have been playing together once a week or so for several months.

2 = weak two
X = takeout
2NT = Lebensohl (not alerted)

South announced at the end of the auction that 2NT should have been alerted, that it was Lebensohl. West was not minded to reopen the auction, and the hand was played out.

Result: 5(S)-1, NS -50.

West asked South why he had bid 4. South replied that he had a weak hand with six diamonds and couldn't stand 3NT. When West suggested this auction usually shows a strong hand, stronger than an immediate NT overcall (say 19+), South said they play 2NT as 17-20, and that it was not likely that North had a stronger hand than this. Under "defence to weak twos" the NS convention card had "X = takeout, 2NT = Lebensohl (0-9)" There was no mention of a range for NT overcalls, not on the CC, nor in several pages of system notes.

If called as director to give a ruling, what would you do?
0

#2 User is offline   campboy 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,347
  • Joined: 2009-July-21

Posted 2012-March-20, 08:33

People get dealt 21-counts from time to time. I don't see any reason to suppose that North does not have a strong hand other than the failure to alert. I think passing is a logical alternative, and would adjust to 3NT, probably with a weighted score between two or more numbers of tricks (6 and 7 look plausible).
0

#3 User is offline   bluejak 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,686
  • Joined: 2007-August-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Liverpool, UK
  • Interests:Bridge Laws, Cats, Railways, Transport timetables

Posted 2012-March-20, 08:35

At first sight, it is not clear that E/W have been damaged. Surely West would lead a spade against 3NT, and South will only go off if he really plays it incompetently - and then only one off.

It is important to give N/S a PP. I explain to him the ramifications of Law 73C, and point out that "it was not likely that North had a stronger hand than this" is completely inadequate: he might have a stronger hand, and it is only the failure to alert that tells South otherwise.
David Stevenson

Merseyside England UK
EBL TD
Currently at home
Visiting IBLF from time to time
<webjak666@gmail.com>
2

#4 User is offline   bluejak 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,686
  • Joined: 2007-August-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Liverpool, UK
  • Interests:Bridge Laws, Cats, Railways, Transport timetables

Posted 2012-March-20, 08:36

I posted the above while campboy was posting. If he can convince me of his bridge judgement, great: but I still do not see why 3NT should go off.
David Stevenson

Merseyside England UK
EBL TD
Currently at home
Visiting IBLF from time to time
<webjak666@gmail.com>
0

#5 User is offline   campboy 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,347
  • Joined: 2009-July-21

Posted 2012-March-20, 08:52

Ah, I was looking at 3NT by North :blink:
0

#6 User is offline   PeterAlan 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 616
  • Joined: 2010-May-03
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-March-20, 09:18

View Postbluejak, on 2012-March-20, 08:35, said:

At first sight, it is not clear that E/W have been damaged. Surely West would lead a spade against 3NT, and South will only go off if he really plays it incompetently - and then only one off.

Actually, it can always be taken 1 off on a lead (and 2 on a low or ). Say S wins the 7 lead and clears the , W winning the second round. W now cashes A and leads the , and E-W will come to 2 tricks and A.
0

#7 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2012-March-20, 09:20

Gotta be the same in any jurisdiction, and gotta be what Bluejack said (his first post). Just the cut of the green that E/W can't further gain from what happened. Down one seems right.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#8 User is offline   wank 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,866
  • Joined: 2008-July-13

Posted 2012-March-20, 09:23

Even the most incompetent defence would be doing well to let declarer make 3N. Even if you make him lead a spade, which I wouldn't do myself, he'll see his partner discard on the second round of diamonds and presumably encourage hearts. If he switches at this point that's -2. If you make him cash a 2nd spade (absurdly), he can still switch to hearts for -1.

I think any weighting which involves it making is ridiculous and any weighting involving anything more than a token %age for -1 to be too generous to the offenders.
0

#9 User is offline   PeterAlan 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 616
  • Joined: 2010-May-03
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-March-20, 09:48

View Postwank, on 2012-March-20, 09:23, said:

Even the most incompetent defence would be doing well to let declarer make 3N. Even if you make him lead a spade, which I wouldn't do myself, he'll see his partner discard on the second round of diamonds and presumably encourage hearts. If he switches at this point that's -2. If you make him cash a 2nd spade (absurdly), he can still switch to hearts for -1.

I think any weighting which involves it making is ridiculous and any weighting involving anything more than a token %age for -1 to be too generous to the offenders.

It makes no difference whether W cashes A or switches immediately to a , it's -1 in both cases. In the second case, provided declarer ducks the in dummy and E's continuation, E's effectively endplayed for -1 not -2. -2 requires not leading in the first place.
0

#10 User is offline   wank 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,866
  • Joined: 2008-July-13

Posted 2012-March-20, 10:51

ok if declarer forsees squeezing himself, is willing to duck 2 hearts cutting himself off from his ace and his queen of spades, then gets the clubs right (ok that bit shouldn't be too tricky) he can escape for -1.

back in the real world....
0

#11 User is offline   mgoetze 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,942
  • Joined: 2005-January-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cologne, Germany
  • Interests:Sleeping, Eating

Posted 2012-March-20, 14:14

Not only is pass a LA, I would go so far as to say that anything other than pass is clearly not a LA.
"One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision"
    -- Bertrand Russell
0

#12 User is offline   wyman 

  • Redoubling with gusto
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,712
  • Joined: 2009-October-19
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV
  • Interests:Math, Bridge, Beer. Often at the same time.

Posted 2012-March-20, 14:16

View Postmgoetze, on 2012-March-20, 14:14, said:

Not only is pass a LA, I would go so far as to say that anything other than pass is clearly not a LA.


... so no infraction?
"I think maybe so and so was caught cheating but maybe I don't have the names right". Sure, and I think maybe your mother .... Oh yeah, that was someone else maybe. -- kenberg

"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
0

#13 User is offline   mgoetze 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,942
  • Joined: 2005-January-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cologne, Germany
  • Interests:Sleeping, Eating

Posted 2012-March-20, 18:10

View Postwyman, on 2012-March-20, 14:16, said:

... so no infraction?


Hm, don't know how you got to that conclusion. ;)

In case it wasn't clear I was talking about South's 4 bid. Having said that 4 is not a LA, the next question is was it demonstrably suggested by the UI? Definitely yes IMO. So there you have your infraction.
"One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision"
    -- Bertrand Russell
0

#14 User is offline   wyman 

  • Redoubling with gusto
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,712
  • Joined: 2009-October-19
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV
  • Interests:Math, Bridge, Beer. Often at the same time.

Posted 2012-March-20, 18:26

View Postmgoetze, on 2012-March-20, 18:10, said:

Hm, don't know how you got to that conclusion. ;)

In case it wasn't clear I was talking about South's 4 bid. Having said that 4 is not a LA, the next question is was it demonstrably suggested by the UI? Definitely yes IMO. So there you have your infraction.


It's only illegal to select from among logical alternatives one suggested by the UI. If you rule that 4D is not a LA, then...
"I think maybe so and so was caught cheating but maybe I don't have the names right". Sure, and I think maybe your mother .... Oh yeah, that was someone else maybe. -- kenberg

"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
0

#15 User is offline   Vampyr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,611
  • Joined: 2009-September-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:London

Posted 2012-March-20, 18:45

View Postwyman, on 2012-March-20, 18:26, said:

It's only illegal to select from among logical alternatives one suggested by the UI. If you rule that 4D is not a LA, then...


This idea has long been discredited and is considered to be an error in the wording of the laws.
I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones -- Albert Einstein
0

#16 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2012-March-20, 18:59

Yes. It would be ridiculous to allow a bid suggested by UI which would not even be considered otherwise.

How would the TD word his ruling to the table? "The bid you made stands even though it was suggested by unauthorized information; but since it was illogical without such information, I must allow it."
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#17 User is offline   wyman 

  • Redoubling with gusto
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,712
  • Joined: 2009-October-19
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV
  • Interests:Math, Bridge, Beer. Often at the same time.

Posted 2012-March-20, 19:15

View PostVampyr, on 2012-March-20, 18:45, said:

This idea has long been discredited and is considered to be an error in the wording of the laws.


thats fine.

but then why bother pointing out that 4D is not a LA?

Also, the rule is clear to me, and the ruling on this hand is clear as well imo (adjust to 3N making some number, weighted or not depending on jurisdiction, PP for offender who should know better). But this game is complicated enough for beginners without having (lots of lots of detailed) laws, at least one of which has a literal meaning that has "long been discredited." There should really be something done about that.
"I think maybe so and so was caught cheating but maybe I don't have the names right". Sure, and I think maybe your mother .... Oh yeah, that was someone else maybe. -- kenberg

"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
0

#18 User is offline   mgoetze 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,942
  • Joined: 2005-January-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cologne, Germany
  • Interests:Sleeping, Eating

Posted 2012-March-20, 20:07

View Postwyman, on 2012-March-20, 19:15, said:

but then why bother pointing out that 4D is not a LA?


I meant to reinforce the notion of a PP. Of course I'm all for taking laws literally so if you want to do only the PP that's fine with me. Just make it a bit bigger to compensate. ;)
"One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision"
    -- Bertrand Russell
0

#19 User is offline   PeterAlan 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 616
  • Joined: 2010-May-03
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-March-20, 20:15

View Postwank, on 2012-March-20, 10:51, said:

ok if declarer forsees squeezing himself, is willing to duck 2 hearts cutting himself off from his ace and his queen of spades, then gets the clubs right (ok that bit shouldn't be too tricky) he can escape for -1.

back in the real world....

This is secondary: the essential point of my original post was that, contrary to what was being suggested at the time, 3NT doesn't make: instead, it's -2 on an intial (low) or lead, -1 on a .

I happen to disagree with you over whether anything more than -1 is likely in the latter case. Of course you're right to say that W shouldn't make it easy by cashing A after winning the and before switching to , but by the time E plays a second and W shows out, S has pretty much got a complete count on the hand, knows that he's not locked out of dummy permanently, and can also see that taking the and running the will squeeze dummy in the endgame. So he ducks again, and from that point on the hand pretty much plays itself for -1 since W can't have A. But we agree completely that 3NT making should have zero weight, and that the adjudication should be some mix of -1 and -2.
0

#20 User is offline   mgoetze 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,942
  • Joined: 2005-January-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cologne, Germany
  • Interests:Sleeping, Eating

Posted 2012-March-20, 20:42

I'm sorry, I don't know your English levels very well. Is "complete count on the hand" a term normally used when discussing what might happen when a hand is played by "experienced regular county B-team players"?
"One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision"
    -- Bertrand Russell
1

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users