1♣ 1♠
3♠
1♠= dbl negative 3♠= 7+ tricks 6+spades.
Deal #3
#43
Posted 2013-January-30, 01:59
mr1303, on 2013-January-29, 18:29, said:
Unconvincing auction here
Is 2♠ game-forcing? an Acol 2? something else? Did you also consider the option I chose (in almost the same spot) of North bidding clubs over 2♠? That keeps 3NT in the picture at the cost of not necessarily showing both suits. It is just that the difference between our contracts looks to me less about system as about judgement and decisions. That makes it more difficult to straube to evaluate. Which route do the others prefer?
(-: Zel :-)
#44
Posted 2013-February-05, 16:49
The hand is too strong to be in the 18-21 category so
1C--1S (str, No M w or GF)
2D--2S (almost GF any shape, GF values 2-5 pts)
3S--3NT (showing 6 decent spades, soff
all pass.
1C--1S (str, No M w or GF)
2D--2S (almost GF any shape, GF values 2-5 pts)
3S--3NT (showing 6 decent spades, soff
all pass.
From Psych "I mean, Gus and I never see eye-to-eye on work stuff.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#45
Posted 2013-February-14, 19:39
Molybdenum pass system:
P - 1♣ (1♥) (opening, forced bid, overcall)
3♠ - 4♠ (South has 4 losers in spades and north has no heart stopper so they are pretty much forced to bid like this after the overcall)
P - 1♣ (1♥) (opening, forced bid, overcall)
3♠ - 4♠ (South has 4 losers in spades and north has no heart stopper so they are pretty much forced to bid like this after the overcall)
Become yourself.
#46
Posted 2013-February-20, 12:45
Unnamed Homebrew Diamond:
we do have a "spades or both minors" preempt available, but I doubt either of us would open it second in at red on this... heap. So, S opens 1♦:
1♦-1♥ 16+, excluding GF / 0-7, no 6-card suit to an honour
2♠-?? 2♠ here is "almost-GF, single-suited" - much like an Acol 2, but definitely NF. N may pass here, or may try 3♦, in which case:
-3♦ showing a suit
5♦-end Anything else is NF, and when N shows diamonds with spade shortage this hand is worth a bid.
To be honest, I think 5♦ is resulting and we're more likely to subside in 2♠. It is possible that S decides his hand is worth a GF, though 4 losers is a bit much. In that case the auction runs:
3♥-3♠ Spades, weak or GF / transfer completion
4♣-4♠ 8 or 10 CPs / I don't care, we're not playing slam
we do have a "spades or both minors" preempt available, but I doubt either of us would open it second in at red on this... heap. So, S opens 1♦:
1♦-1♥ 16+, excluding GF / 0-7, no 6-card suit to an honour
2♠-?? 2♠ here is "almost-GF, single-suited" - much like an Acol 2, but definitely NF. N may pass here, or may try 3♦, in which case:
-3♦ showing a suit
5♦-end Anything else is NF, and when N shows diamonds with spade shortage this hand is worth a bid.
To be honest, I think 5♦ is resulting and we're more likely to subside in 2♠. It is possible that S decides his hand is worth a GF, though 4 losers is a bit much. In that case the auction runs:
3♥-3♠ Spades, weak or GF / transfer completion
4♣-4♠ 8 or 10 CPs / I don't care, we're not playing slam
#47
Posted 2013-February-27, 06:37
straube, on 2013-January-13, 02:17, said:
You are South and fourth seat. Unfavorable. RHO sticks in a 1H bid if available.
................void
................842
................Q8643
................QJT72
8632..........................J74
J6...............................KQ953
JT2.............................97
A954..........................K63
................AKQT95
................AT7
................AK5
................8
................void
................842
................Q8643
................QJT72
8632..........................J74
J6...............................KQ953
JT2.............................97
A954..........................K63
................AKQT95
................AT7
................AK5
................8
Pass 2000
(North's initial pass means 0-7 or 17+ and is forcing)
1C-1D; (0-7 / 17+ -- 0-7)
(1H)
Our agreements after disturbed bidding haven't been discussed very much, except "strong hand must act, weak hand may not act on its own". I would probably bid like this:
2S - 3D; (2S should show extras and a good suit)
3S - 4C; (I don't really like the 3S bid, but 3H should probably be asking for stoppers)
4D - 5D;
It is possible to just bid 4S by south too (after 4C), which would then be the final contract. I guess this is more of a judgement thing than a system thing, in our case.
#48
Posted 2013-February-28, 19:57
Upgraded Ultra Club Relay (C3)
- - - 1♣
- 1♦ (1♥) 1♠
- 2♦ = natural and 5+ hcp - 2NT
- 3♣ - 3NT All pass
- - - 1♣
- 1♦ (1♥) 1♠
- 2♦ = natural and 5+ hcp - 2NT
- 3♣ - 3NT All pass
Ultra ♣ Relay: see Daniel's web page: https://bridgewithda...19/07/Ultra.pdf
C3: Copious Canape Club is still my favorite system. (Ultra upgraded, PM for notes)
Santa Fe Precision ♣ published 8/19. TOP3 published 11/20. Magic experiment (Science Modernized) with Lenzo. 2020: Jan Eric Larsson's Cottontail ♣. 2020. BFUN (Bridge For the UNbalanced) 2021: Weiss Simplified ♣ (Canape & Relay). 2022: Canary ♣ Modernized, 2023-4: KOK Canape.
C3: Copious Canape Club is still my favorite system. (Ultra upgraded, PM for notes)
Santa Fe Precision ♣ published 8/19. TOP3 published 11/20. Magic experiment (Science Modernized) with Lenzo. 2020: Jan Eric Larsson's Cottontail ♣. 2020. BFUN (Bridge For the UNbalanced) 2021: Weiss Simplified ♣ (Canape & Relay). 2022: Canary ♣ Modernized, 2023-4: KOK Canape.