这道题面确实很难为人,难度很大。
那么这道题刊出后,高手们答案五花八门,我的意见最终作为结束性收尾,也是颇具典型性的发言,同时也获得一些专家们的认可。下面就谈谈我的见解,欢迎大家积极讨论。
这是题面出处链接
lycier, on 2013-January-15, 21:51, said:
The first double is a take-out,the hand which the second double showed can't be changed into other shapes not because of what the second take-out is,but because of which hand must be made more stronger! I decide to bid 5nt so as to let partner pick up a suit..
大意是:第一个加倍是技术性加倍,第二个加倍所描述的牌情并不因为第二个加倍是什么而会改变当初第一个加倍的牌型,只是防守实力变得更加强劲!所以我决定再叫5nt!让同伴选择一个花色!
gnasher, on 2013-January-16, 07:34, said:
You misunderstand me. I think that partner can have AKxx AKx x KQxxx.
I think his double says "I have a good hand with short diamonds, and I think it likely that we could make game." I don't care what you call that double.
Anyway, you agree that partner can have AKxx AKx x KQxxx. You also say that you want to bid 5NT with J10xx QJ98 x J10xx. So, with these two hands, you will reach 6♣. Can you see any problem with this?
大意是:你误会我了,我认为同伴持有 AKxx AKx x KQxxx. 我觉得第二个加倍是说:我有一手好牌,短在
♦,我们很可能成局。我不关心第二个加倍是什么。