After jump rebid
#1
Posted 2015-January-17, 03:13
None vuln
♠
♥ A9
♦ AJ103
♣ AQ97532
Pard you
1♠ ... 2♣ (F1)
3♠ ... ??
3♠ is 15-17 and good 6 card suit. Normally has no other 4 card suit.
4♦ now is undiscussed.
What now?
#2
Posted 2015-January-17, 06:04
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#4
Posted 2015-January-17, 07:54
#5
Posted 2015-January-17, 07:55
Given that 2C is not GF I would simply have defined 3S as establishing a GF with a robust 6+ card suit. HCP undefined but not excluding 18-19, and I can imagine shapely hands where I would do it with 14. I suppose that 4S rebid should have a meaning, but pretty specific.
Psyche (pron. sahy-kee): The human soul, spirit or mind (derived, personification thereof, beloved of Eros, Greek myth).
Masterminding (pron. mstr-mnding) tr. v. - Any bid made by bridge player with which partner disagrees.
"Gentlemen, when the barrage lifts." 9th battalion, King's own Yorkshire light infantry,
2000 years earlier: "morituri te salutant"
"I will be with you, whatever". Blair to Bush, precursor to invasion of Iraq
#6
Posted 2015-January-17, 08:04
the hog, on 2015-January-17, 07:54, said:
Many would play 4D as a cue-bid but 4C not. That's why 4C is better.
London UK
#7
Posted 2015-January-17, 09:37
I'm tempted to shoot 6♣ and expect to have a play opposite a stiff. If partner converts to 6♠ it's not my problem anymore.
Could a non solid partnership bid 4♣ minus those red Aces? I've seen pick up pairs pass that bid.
What is baby oil made of?
#8
Posted 2015-January-17, 10:21
If there is a chance partner might mistake 4♦ for a cue, then 4♣ is probably the safer bid.
BTW, there are several bids I would rate more highly than 4NT RKCB that you did not mention, including 6♣. 4NT is a terrible bid.
-- Bertrand Russell
#9
Posted 2015-January-17, 13:34
#10
Posted 2015-January-17, 14:02
For the reason Arend said.
.
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#11
Posted 2015-January-17, 18:41
cherdano, on 2015-January-17, 13:34, said:
Bidding is a 2 way street. Perhaps you need to play a relay system. I wish the op had given us a little more information about his expectations of the 3S bid. When I see the rubbish that some posters bid 3S on on this site, we may not even have a game :-)
In the meantime I am going to show my partner that I have length in C and also have a D suit. Who says it needs to be 5?
#12
Posted 2015-January-18, 04:21
cherdano, on 2015-January-17, 13:34, said:
Sometimes people bid suits to show shape, even though no fit is possible. I think most would agree that
1♣ 1NT
2♥
does not show a 6-5. But ok, this is at the two level.. I agree that at the FOUR level things should perhaps be different
For the record, in a past partnership of mine we used to play
1M 2x
3M 2x+1
as cue/slam invite. (We had a gadget for the hardest case: 1♠-2♥-3♠-??)
#13
Posted 2015-January-18, 17:57
Add these to your "bidding challenge" set:
♠
♥ A9
♦ AJ103
♣ AQ97532
♠ AQ10432
♥ Q43
♦ KQ5
♣ K