MrAce, on 2018-May-13, 12:04, said:
You are correct.
Evaluating Axx and AJT both as 2 losers means one has to find either a new game or hand evaluation method IMO.
Winstonm, on 2018-May-13, 13:14, said:
I think it is a matter of being wiser than your system, i.e., not being slave to it but using it. Isn't it sufficient to utilize a blunt weapon (point count, LTC) for the big picture but use bridge knowledge AJx is slightly better than Axx while AJ10 is much better) for fine-tuning?
Point being that in the auction given the wrong 3 cover cover cards opposite does not yield a good play for slam: xxxx, Kx, Qxx, Qxxx, but at the same time AJ10 is better than AJx, which is better than Axx. Doesn't take a system to know that with AJ10, AJ10 you can bid more aggressively than with AJx or Axx.
Agreed, but why people continue to evaluate such a hand as 5 loser when it is closer to 3 loser escapes me.
Apparently when it comes to counting loser they do not know the difference between Qxx, Axx and AJT and they do count loser to justify their poor bidding decision.
With xxxx Kx Qxx Qxxx slam may be marginal though not poor, but with xxxx x Qxx KQxxx it is excellent
I would bid 3
♠ (assuming no special agreements) followed next by a heart bid.
The hand is clearly too strong for an immediate 4
♥ bid.
Rainer Herrmann