Slam Decision
#1
Posted 2013-June-24, 08:07
Early in the day in a small regional swiss teams, you hold this hand:
Axx
ATx
xx
AJxxx
Vul against not, you open the bidding in 1st seat and the bidding goes as follows:
1♣ - (2♥) - 2♠ - (5♥)
x - (P) - 5♠ - (P)
?
1) Do you agree with the double of 5♥?
2) What now and why?
#2
Posted 2013-June-24, 08:23
I would bid 6♠, expecting it to make. I would like to fish for 7♠, but things will get murky and it is better to be happy with the small slam.
Rik
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
#3
Posted 2013-June-24, 08:43
-gwnn
#4
Posted 2013-June-24, 09:09
#5
Posted 2013-June-27, 07:21
situation. The very fact that we are now wonderring if we can make
6/7 merely adds emphasis to the first sentence. Bid 6s since it's too
difficult at this point to convince p we have a legitimate shot at 7.
#7
Posted 2013-June-27, 10:03
i would like to bid 6 clubs, which should be a grand try imo. i don't see how you can have a hand that makes a penalty X of 5h and then pulls 5s to 6c. still, i wouldn't wheel it out at the table for obvious reasons.
5nt is a good compromise. encouraging with much less chance of being misinterpreted.
#8
Posted 2013-June-27, 10:17
6S now, although if I had doubled 5H in our FP I would be seriously concerned that I had screwed up a Grand.
#9
Posted 2013-June-27, 10:48
Axx
ATx
xx
AJxxx
QJT9xx
-----
KQ
Kxxxx
The ♠K was onside singleton.
I ruffed the opening heart lead and drew trump. Dummy's spot was big enough to win the third round of spades. I played a diamond off dummy. When RHO ducked, the diamond loser went away on dummy's ♥A.
My partner passed 5♠ but we did win one IMP on the board.
#10
Posted 2013-June-27, 15:49
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#11
Posted 2013-June-27, 15:59
ArtK78, on 2013-June-24, 08:07, said:
Early in the day in a small regional swiss teams, you hold this hand: ♠ A x x ♥ A T x ♦ x x ♣ A J x x x
Vul against not, you open the bidding in 1st seat and the bidding goes as follows:
1♣ - (2♥) - 2♠ - (5♥)
x - (P) - 5♠ - (P)
?
1) Do you agree with the double of 5♥?
2) What now and why?
- Over 5♥, Double = 10, Pass = 9, 5♠ = 8, 6♠ = 5. I don't think partner's 2♠ creates an FP context.
- After 5♠, 6♠ = 10, Pass = 8, 6♥ = 5, 7♠ = 3.
#12
Posted 2013-June-28, 07:26
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel