ridiculous meanings for bids means yu can't be competitive
#1
Posted 2022-January-10, 14:21
ridiculous, i have passed twice
i have 5 clubs and NV just want to play 3C
My hand
i ve passed twice surely i have denied 14 - 16 pts
this makes it impossible to compete to 3♣
#2
Posted 2022-January-10, 15:12
C3: Copious Canape Club is still my favorite system. (Ultra upgraded, PM for notes)
Santa Fe Precision ♣ published 8/19. TOP3 published 11/20. Magic experiment (Science Modernized) with Lenzo. 2020: Jan Eric Larsson's Cottontail ♣. 2020. BFUN (Bridge For the UNbalanced) 2021: Weiss Simplified ♣ (Canape & Relay). 2022: Canary ♣ Modernized, 2023-4: KOK Canape.
#4
Posted 2022-January-10, 16:07
#6
Posted 2022-February-01, 16:10
#7
Posted 2022-February-02, 16:09
steve2005, on 2022-January-10, 14:21, said:
ridiculous, i have passed twice
i have 5 clubs and NV just want to play 3C
My hand
i ve passed twice surely i have denied 14 - 16 pts
this makes it impossible to compete to 3♣
Nobody commented so far on the East-West bidding, but what's up with the 1♥ response by East? West's 1♠ rebid looks okay opposite a natural 1♥, but 2♠ later on???
#8
Posted 2022-February-02, 16:32
johnu, on 2022-February-02, 16:09, said:
Exactly: it is East's perverse refusal to bid or even raise spades that screwed up this auction.
#9
Posted 2022-February-02, 17:11
This particularly example is not even that ridicolous. I have seen far worse. Once I advanced over partner's overcall after opps had opened 2♣. Since my bid showed some 27 points or whatever, partner asked for aces. I passed the 4NT bid, 4NT-9 was a good score. No double no trouble.
#10
Posted 2022-February-04, 16:46
By the way, has an instruction on how to post handviewer links been pinned somewhere? I can never get it to work, even when trying to quote Pilowsky's post above and amend it to my own link.
Thanks pescetom But I had to append 400|300|][/hv] i.e. an extra ]
#11
Posted 2022-February-04, 16:53
helene_t, on 2022-February-04, 16:46, said:
HOW TO INSERT A DIAGRAM WITH PLAY IN A BRIDGEBASE FORUM POST
1. Reviewing the hand record click on Options -> Export Deal -> Handviewer Link. This will give a URL such as:
http://tinyurl.com/7z7qfjw
2. open this in a browser and get redirected to a long URL
3. copy this URL and paste into the body of a new bridgebase forum post
3. remove text up to and including "?"
4. precede with "[hv="
5. append "400|300|[/hv]"
6. add any comments in () brackets
7. preview and adjust if necessary.
PS1: at one point in time it wasn't possible to get the tinyurl with all clients, but just jump to step 3 if this is still the case
PS2: not that I ever remember this either
#12
Posted 2022-February-04, 17:48
I don't know why my diagram becomes so ridiculously small, though. I would think the two last numbers (400 and 300 in your suggestion) control the size but they don't seem to have any effect. Pilowsky used 300 and 300.
#14
Posted 2022-February-04, 17:55
#15
Posted 2022-February-04, 18:17
#16
Posted 2022-February-04, 19:21
The format
Is what I always use.
The above is: The format {hv='full link'}300|300| - your words here - {/hv}
But with square brackets instead of curly braces.
{hv=d=n&v=0&b=1&a=1cppp}133|100| - Also works with the Spade Diagram button on the forum.{/hv}
#17
Posted 2022-February-04, 20:23
pilowsky, on 2022-February-04, 19:21, said:
Just remove the e=xxx and w=xxx hands from the URL, keeping the p=xxx played cards, so you get a URL like this:
https://www.bridgebase.com/tools/handviewer.html?s=SAQ8HT4DKQJT87C82&n=SK94H87D64CAQT743&d=e&v=n&b=2&a=1H2D2HPPD3C4CPPDPP4DDPPP&p=S3S4STSADKD9D4D5DQH6D6D2DJS5C3DAHKH4H2H7H5HTHAH8H3C4HJD7DTS6C7D3C2C5CQC9S9S2SQS7D8C6CTSJC8CKCAHQSKH9S8CJ
s=SAQ8HT4DKQJT87C82 south's hand
n=SK94H87D64CAQT743 north's hand
d=e dealer
v=n vulnerability (n, e, b for both, or leave out)
b=2 board number
a=1H2D2HPPD3C4CPPDPP4DDPPP auction, alerts follow each bid in brackets (url-encoded)
p=S3S4STSADKD9D4D5DQH6D6D2DJS5C3DAHKH4H2H7H5HTHAH8H3C4HJD7DTS6C7D3C2C5CQC9S9S2SQS7D8C6CTSJC8CKCAHQSKH9S8CJ played cards
Total points not HCP.
GIB is assigning an explanation to your bid that would (in its opinion) make it a rational and sensible bid given that you are a passed hand.
It has great support for your shapely 3♣ bid so it came to the party when you invited it.
Ops have 4♠ - so GIB made the right choice.