2D on your right, do you double or bid 2h?
double or bid?
#2
Posted 2008-March-06, 15:56
Assuming that 2♦ is a weak 2 in diamonds I mostly prefer 2♥.
But there is some risk of missing a game ('...if we get by this round...'), so vulnerable at IMPs I would consider double instead.
2NT is also a possibility, I would not choose it because Kx is not a good stopper, and we are offshape and a touch over strength.
#3 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2008-March-06, 16:23
#4
Posted 2008-March-06, 16:57
- hrothgar
#5 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2008-March-06, 17:08
han, on Mar 6 2008, 05:57 PM, said:
so good that it's actually 18!
#6
Posted 2008-March-06, 17:30
If LHO raises and pard passes, I have a 3♥ call. If I overcall 2♥ 1st, its very difficult when 3♦ comes back to me.
#7
Posted 2008-March-06, 17:52
#8 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2008-March-06, 17:55
h2osmom, on Mar 6 2008, 06:52 PM, said:
Gotta pass.
#9
Posted 2008-March-06, 17:56
#10
Posted 2008-March-06, 18:52
Jlall, on Mar 6 2008, 06:08 PM, said:
han, on Mar 6 2008, 05:57 PM, said:
so good that it's actually 18!
Now you know why some think I downgrade a lot.
- hrothgar
#11
Posted 2008-March-07, 01:49
For my taste, doubling with this hand takes this idea too far, I would bid 2 Heart, knowing about the risk and the votes from the young expert.
If I had doubled, pass of 4 Spade is quite obvious. The insufficent trumps makes a slam try impossible.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#12
Posted 2008-March-07, 11:24
Codo, on Mar 7 2008, 02:49 AM, said:
Errr, no, I think it is exactly the opposite.
- hrothgar
#13
Posted 2008-March-07, 11:26
At the 2-level it's a little different. All passing over 2♥ is very possible. I'll double - reluctantly. If partner bids 4♠ I just have to pass.
Harald
#14
Posted 2008-March-07, 12:01
Have to agree with han as for how I see the bbo forums trend on these problems.
#15
Posted 2008-March-07, 12:41
han, on Mar 8 2008, 02:24 AM, said:
Codo, on Mar 7 2008, 02:49 AM, said:
Errr, no, I think it is exactly the opposite.
What did I miss?
I thought all doubles did so, because they feared 2 HEart would be passed too often?
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#16
Posted 2008-March-07, 12:52
What happened at the table is not unexpected.
#17
Posted 2008-March-08, 02:37
#18 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2008-March-08, 02:51
jdonn, on Mar 7 2008, 01:01 PM, said:
You will routinely bid with random 8/9 counts over a 1H overcall (1N or w/e). You would routinely pass these hands after a 2 level overcall of a preempt.
There are many hands you would raise over a 1H overcall that you would pass over a 2 level overcall (5-7 counts). This is because the raise to 3 commits to 9 tricks in a spot where the opps can never compete, so youre jeopardizing seriously your plus in 2H. If you have 6 points and a fit after a 1H overcall its normal to raise because you are never going to play 1H and you only commit to 8 tricks anyways and partner has room to game try and you can sign off (where over the raise to 3 he just has to guess whether to bidgameornot).
Having a lower minimum for a 1 level overcall than a 2 level overcall is not really relevant at all, and does not come close to the importance of being 1 level higher to begin with.
#19
Posted 2008-March-08, 02:59
#20 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2008-March-08, 03:09
jdonn, on Mar 8 2008, 03:59 AM, said:
Yes, but in terms of missing games it is much more likely to happen if you overcall 2H on an 18 count rather than 1H on an 18 count. Obviously getting too high by Xing is more likely after 2x than 1x.
In general I follow the "give partner 7 HCP..." rule and I think that I don't want to miss game opposite hands around that strength, and I think it will happen too often. Obviously stopping in 2H opposite hands partner can have could be a good thing, but I just think that all in all I'm willing to take my chances of getting too high or getting preempted out of ever showing my suit in order to not miss game opposite fairly common hand types.